A Visuoperceptual Measure for Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies (VMV): A Pilot Study of Validity and Reliability in Adults with Dysphagia
- PMID: 35160175
- PMCID: PMC8837107
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030724
A Visuoperceptual Measure for Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies (VMV): A Pilot Study of Validity and Reliability in Adults with Dysphagia
Abstract
The visuoperceptual measure for videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VMV) is a new measure for analysing the recordings from videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS). This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the pilot version of the VMV using classical test theory (CTT) analysis, informed by the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Forty participants, diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia by fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, were recruited. The VFSS and administration of bolus textures and volumes were conducted according to a standardised protocol. Recordings of the VFSS were rated by three blinded raters: a speech-language pathologist, a radiologist and a phoniatrician. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was assessed with a weighted kappa and resulted in 0.889 and 0.944 overall, respectively. Structural validity was determined using exploratory factor analyses, which found four and five factor solutions. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha coefficients, which found all but one factor scoring within an acceptable range (>0.70 and <0.95). Hypothesis testing for construct validity found the expected correlations between the severity of dysphagia and the VMV's performance, and found no impact of gender on measure performance. These results suggest that the VMV has potential as a reliable and valid measure for VFSS. Further validation with a larger sample is required, and validation using an item response theory paradigm approach is recommended.
Keywords: VMV; classic test theory; dysphagia; measure; psychometrics; videofluoroscopic swallow studies.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.Dysphagia. 2019 Feb;34(1):2-33. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9918-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Dysphagia. 2019. PMID: 30019178
-
Validation of the Yale Swallow Protocol: a prospective double-blinded videofluoroscopic study.Dysphagia. 2014 Apr;29(2):199-203. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9488-3. Epub 2013 Sep 12. Dysphagia. 2014. PMID: 24026519
-
Using Classical Test Theory to Determine the Psychometric Properties of the Deglutition Handicap Index.Dysphagia. 2022 Feb;37(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10250-2. Epub 2021 Jan 30. Dysphagia. 2022. PMID: 33515311 Free PMC article.
-
Visuoperceptual Analysis of the Videofluoroscopic Study of Swallowing: An International Delphi Study.Dysphagia. 2021 Aug;36(4):595-613. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10174-3. Epub 2020 Sep 4. Dysphagia. 2021. PMID: 32888067
-
Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Multidisciplinary Alternative for Assessment of Infants With Dysphagia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Feb;16(1):37-43. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000245. Adv Neonatal Care. 2016. PMID: 26709466 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in Management of Voice and Swallowing Disorders.J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 21;11(9):2308. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092308. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35566434 Free PMC article.
-
Inference of core needle biopsy whole slide images requiring definitive therapy for prostate cancer.BMC Cancer. 2023 Jan 5;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10488-5. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 36600203 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of the Group for Learning Useful and Performant Swallowing (GLUPS) tool.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):817-826. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08313-1. Epub 2023 Dec 6. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38055045
-
Measuring what matters in healthcare: a practical guide to psychometric principles and instrument development.Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 18;14:1225850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1225850. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37790221 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Mokkink L.B., Prinsen C.A., Bouter L.M., de Vet H.C., Terwee C.B. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2016;20:105–113. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources