Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 1;11(3):793.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11030793.

Effects of Supervised Exercise on the Development of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Effects of Supervised Exercise on the Development of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Marianna Danielli et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are the most common medical complication in pregnancy, affecting approximately 10-15% of pregnancies worldwide. HDP are a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, and each year, worldwide, around 70,000 mothers and 500,000 babies die because of HDP. Up-to-date high-quality systematic reviews quantifying the role of exercise and the risks of developing HDP are currently lacking. Physical exercise is considered to be safe and beneficial to pregnant women. Supervised exercise has been shown to be safe and to be more beneficial than unsupervised exercise in the general population, as well as during pregnancy in women with obesity and diabetes. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effects of women performing supervised exercise during pregnancy compared to a control group (standard antenatal care or unsupervised exercise) on the development of HDP. We searched Medline, Embase, CINHAL, and the Cochrane Library, which were searched from inception to December 2021. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the development of HDP compared to a control group (standard antenatal care or unsupervised exercise) in pregnant women performing supervised exercise. Two independent reviewers selected eligible trials for meta-analysis. Data collection and analyses were performed by two independent reviewers. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42020176814. Of 6332 articles retrieved, 16 RCTs met the eligibility criteria, comparing a total of 5939 pregnant women (2904 pregnant women in the intervention group and 3035 controls). The risk for pregnant women to develop HDP was significantly reduced in the intervention compared to the control groups, with an estimated pooled cumulative incidence of developing HDP of 3% in the intervention groups (95% CI: 3 to 4) and of 5% in the control groups (95% CI: 5 to 6), and a pooled odds ratio (OR) comparing intervention to control of 0.54 (95% CI:0.40 to 0.72, p < 0.001). A combination of aerobic and anaerobic exercise, or yoga alone, had a greater beneficial effect compared to performing aerobic exercise only (mixed-OR = 0.50, 95% CI:0.33 to 0.75, p = 0.001; yoga-OR = 0.28, 95% CI:0.13 to 0.58, p = 0.001); aerobic exercise only-OR = 0.87, 95% CI:0.55 to 1.37, p = 0.539). Pregnancy is an opportunity for healthcare providers to promote positive health activities, thus optimizing the health of pregnant women with potential short- and long-term benefits for both mother and child. This systematic review and meta-analysis support a beneficial effect of either structured exercise (combination of aerobic, strength, and flexibility workouts) or yoga for preventing the onset of HDP. Yoga, considered a low-impact physical activity, could be more acceptable and safer for women in pregnancy in reducing the risk of developing HDP.

Keywords: exercise; gestational hypertension; meta-analysis; physical activity; pre-eclampsia; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

T.Y. reports receiving grants from NIHR Leicester BRC during the study. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow chart of literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot by type of physical exercise performed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for subgroup analysis by type of HDP.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot for subgroup analysis by continent.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot for subgroup analysis by setting.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rana S., Lemoine E., Granger J.P., Karumanchi S.A. Preeclampsia: Pathophysiology, challenges, and perspectives. Circ. Res. 2019;124:1094–1112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313276. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braunthal S., Brateanu A. Hypertension in pregnancy: Pathophysiology and treatment. SAGE Open Med. 2019;7:2050312119843700. doi: 10.1177/2050312119843700. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang W., Xie X., Yuan T., Wang Y., Zhao F., Zhou Z., Zhang H. Epidemiological trends of maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at the global, regional, and national levels: A population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:364. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03809-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. James J.L., Whitley G.S., Cartwright J.E. Pre-eclampsia: Fitting together the placental, immune and cardiovascular pieces. J. Pathol. 2010;221:363–378. doi: 10.1002/path.2719. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vata P.K., Chauhan N.M., Nallathambi A., Hussein F. Assessment of prevalence of preeclampsia from dilla region of ethiopia. BMC Res. Notes. 2015;8:816. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1821-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources