Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 8;11(3):466.
doi: 10.3390/plants11030466.

Water Deficit Stress Tolerance Potential of Newly Developed Wheat Genotypes for Better Yield Based on Agronomic Traits and Stress Tolerance Indices: Physio-Biochemical Responses, Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism

Affiliations

Water Deficit Stress Tolerance Potential of Newly Developed Wheat Genotypes for Better Yield Based on Agronomic Traits and Stress Tolerance Indices: Physio-Biochemical Responses, Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism

Sumreena Shahid et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Changing environmental conditions, fresh water shortages for irrigation and the rapid increase in world population have created the problems of food insecurity and malnutrition. Different strategies, including the development of water stress-tolerant, high-yielding genotypes through breeding are used to fulfil the world food demand. The present study was conducted for the selection of high-yielding, drought-tolerant wheat genotypes, considering different morpho-physio-biochemical, agronomic and yield attributes in relation to the stress tolerance indices (STI). The experiment was carried out in field in a split-plot arrangement. Water deficit stress was maintained based on the number of irrigations. All genotypes showed a differential decreasing trend in different agronomic traits. However, the increasing or decreasing trend in leaf photosynthetic pigments, non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants under limited water supply also found to be genotype-specific. Genotypes MP1, MP3, MP5, MP8 and MP10 performed better regarding the yield performance under water deficit stress, which was associated with their better maintenance of water relations, photosynthetic pigments and antioxidative defense mechanisms. In conclusion, the physio-biochemical mechanisms should also be considered as the part of breeding programs for the selection of stress-tolerant genotypes, along with agronomic traits, in wheat.

Keywords: agronomic traits; breeding; oxidative stress; photosynthetic pigments; water relations; water stress; yield.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Leaf hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), (B) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (C) activities of catalase (CAT), (D) ascorbate peroxidase (APX), (E) peroxidase (POD), (F) content of malondialdehyde (MDA) and (G) leaf relative membrane permeability (LRMP) of the newly developed inbreed wheat genotypes under limited water supply and normal irrigation (Mean ± SE; n = 4). (Bars against a wheat genotype with * shows significance effect of water deficit stress).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Leaf total phenolic contents (TPC), flavonoids and ascorbic acid (AsA), of newly developed inbreed wheat genotypes when grown under limited water supply and normal irrigation (Mean ± SE; n = 4). (Bars against a wheat genotype with * shows significance effect of water deficit stress).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total soluble sugars (TSS), non-reducing sugars (NRS), reducing sugars (RS), leaf-free amino acids (FAA), total soluble proteins (TSP), and anthocyanin contents of newly developed inbreed wheat genotypes under limited water supply and normal irrigation (Mean ± SE; n = 4). (Bars against a wheat genotype with * shows significance effect of water deficit stress.).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Principal component analyses (PCA) for different growth, biochemical and physiological attributes of newly developed wheat genotypes under limited water supply and normal irrigation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mancosu N., Snyder R.L., Kyriakakis G., Spano D. Water scarcity and future challenges for food production. Water. 2015;7:975–992. doi: 10.3390/w7030975. - DOI
    1. FAO Declaration of the World Summit on Food Security; Proceedings of the World Summit on Food Security; Rome, Italy. 16–18 November 2009.
    1. Shideed K.H. Informing Policy Development for Sustainable and Productive Food Production Systems in Dry Areas. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA); Aleppo, Syria: 2011.
    1. Fraiture C.D., Molden D., Wichetns D. Investing in water for food, ecosystem and livelihoods: An overview of the comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Agric. Water Manag. 2010;97:495–501. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.08.015. - DOI
    1. Suleimenov M., Saparov A., Akshalov K., Kaskarbayev Z. VI-6 Land degradation issues in Kazakhstan and measures to address them: Research and adoption. Jap. Soc. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. Abstr. 2011;57:225.

LinkOut - more resources