Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 4;22(3):1196.
doi: 10.3390/s22031196.

Smart Eyeglasses: A Valid and Reliable Device to Assess Spatiotemporal Parameters during Gait

Affiliations

Smart Eyeglasses: A Valid and Reliable Device to Assess Spatiotemporal Parameters during Gait

Justine Hellec et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The study aims to determine the validity and reproducibility of step duration and step length parameters measured during walking in healthy participants using an accelerometer embedded in smart eyeglasses. Twenty young volunteers participated in two identical sessions comprising a 30 s gait assessment performed at three different treadmill speeds under two conditions (i.e., with and without a cervical collar). Spatiotemporal parameters (i.e., step duration and step length normalized by the lower limb length) were obtained with both the accelerometer embedded in smart eyeglasses and an optoelectronic system. The relative intra- and inter-session reliability of step duration and step length computed from the vertical acceleration data were excellent for all experimental conditions. An excellent absolute reliability was observed for the eyeglasses for all conditions and concurrent validity between systems was observed. An accelerometer incorporated in smart eyeglasses is accurate to measure step duration and step length during gait.

Keywords: accelerometer; reliability; reproducibility; spatiotemporal parameters; validity; wearable sensor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Justine Hellec is employed by the company producing the eyeglasses to realize a Ph.D. thesis. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant walking on the treadmill with the equipment set up (A) and 3D schematic representation of the gait analysis laboratory (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Position of the retroreflective marker on the right arm of the glasses and axes of the IMU and retroreflective marker.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Acceleration signals from the glasses and optoelectronic system during gait cycle in 0.90 m/s speed without a cervical collar for one participant (red and blue colors indicate the right and the left lower limb, respectively).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pearson’s correlation of the step duration measured with the optoelectronic system and the glasses during the 30 s of gait at 0.90 m/s without a cervical collar for both test sessions.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Pearson’s correlation of the step length normalized by the lower limb length measured with the optoelectronic system and the glasses during 30 s of gait at 0.90 m/s without a cervical collar for both test sessions.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Bland-Altman plots of the step duration recorded without a cervical collar during the moderate speed condition (i.e., 0.90 m/s) for both testing sessions showing the differences between the glasses and OptiTrack against the mean of the two systems. The solid horizontal line represents the estimated bias, and the dashed lines represent the 95% limits of agreement.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bohannon R.W. Number of Pedometer-Assessed Steps Taken Per Day by Adults: A Descriptive Meta-Analysis. Phys. Ther. 2007;87:1642–1650. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Studenski S., Perera S., Patel K., Rosano C., Faulkner K., Inzitari M., Brach J., Chandler J., Cawthon P., Connor E.B., et al. Gait Speed and Survival in Older Adults. JAMA. 2011;305:50–58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tinetti M.E., Speechley M., Ginter S.F. Risk Factors for Falls among Elderly Persons Living in the Community. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988;319:1701–1707. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812293192604. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel M., Pavic A., Goodwin V.A. Wearable Inertial Sensors to Measure Gait and Posture Characteristic Differences in Older Adult Fallers and Non-Fallers: A Scoping Review. Gait Posture. 2020;76:110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.10.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lord S., Galna B., Verghese J., Coleman S., Burn D., Rochester L. Independent Domains of Gait in Older Adults and Associated Motor and Nonmotor Attributes: Validation of a Factor Analysis Approach. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2013;68:820–827. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls255. - DOI - PubMed