A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women's Satisfaction
- PMID: 35162764
- PMCID: PMC8835069
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031741
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women's Satisfaction
Abstract
Introduction: Pain experienced during labor is a symptom of contractile activity and is a physiological feature of the uterus that occurs at the appropriate stages of labor. For the majority of women, labor pain is the most severe pain they will ever experience, and therefore should be relieved.
Objective: (1) To evaluate labor pain intensity before and after using non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions; (2) to assess women's satisfaction of labor pain management.
Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional survey study was performed on 500 women who gave birth in different reference level hospitals (i.e., I, II, III). Pain intensity was assessed according the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0-10), whereas women's satisfaction was measured with a 5 point Likert scale.
Results: The use of both non-pharmacological (median 6.7 (5; 8) vs. 4.5 (3.3; 5.5)) and pharmacological methods (median 8 (7; 9) vs. 5 (3; 6)) resulted in a significant reduction in pain (p < 0.01). Water immersion and epidural anesthesia proved to be the most effective non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods, respectively. In hospitals of reference I, analgesic management was based primarily on the use of non-pharmacological techniques, less often mixed, i.e., non-pharmacological and pharmacological techniques (27.5%). On the other hand, in hospitals with higher referentiality, mixed methods were used more often (level II-65.8%; level III-81.2%). Pain intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in hospitals with reference level I (median 5 (4; 6)) than in the hospitals with reference level II (median 4.2 (3; 5)) or level III (median 4.2 (3.3; 5.4)). Epidural anesthesia was most often performed (60%) in the hospital of reference II. Women's satisfaction (median 4 (3; 5)), inter alia, was associated with the effectiveness of applied methods.
Conclusions: The study findings suggest that women giving birth in hospitals of higher referentiality have better control of labor pain due to access to pharmacological methods. Epidural anesthesia remains the gold standard for relieving labor pain. The choice of a specific method is determined by the degree of hospital and associated with the pain referentiality.
Keywords: delivery; level of hospital reference; non-pharmacological methods; pain; pharmacological methods.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review.Reprod Health. 2019 May 30;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0735-4. Reprod Health. 2019. PMID: 31146759 Free PMC article.
-
Race inequality in epidural use and regional anesthesia failure in labor and birth: an examination of women's experience.Sex Reprod Healthc. 2014 Dec;5(4):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 28. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2014. PMID: 25433830
-
Impact of Labor Epidural Analgesia on Maternal Satisfaction and Childbirth Expectations in a Tertiary Care Center in Portugal: A Prospective Study.Acta Med Port. 2021 Mar 31;34(4):272-277. doi: 10.20344/amp.13599. Epub 2021 Apr 1. Acta Med Port. 2021. PMID: 34214419
-
Women's experience and satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care: a cross-sectional survey in China.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03638-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 33607963 Free PMC article.
-
Can women in labor give informed consent to epidural analgesia?Bioethics. 2019 May;33(4):475-486. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12517. Epub 2018 Oct 25. Bioethics. 2019. PMID: 30358905
Cited by
-
The efficacy and safety of remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia in labor: A meta-analysis and systematic review.PLoS One. 2022 Dec 19;17(12):e0275716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275716. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36534641 Free PMC article.
-
Perception, practice and associated factors of labour pain management among obstetric care providers in public health facilities in Harari Region, Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study.Int Health. 2025 Jul 1;17(4):481-488. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihae084. Int Health. 2025. PMID: 39569470 Free PMC article.
-
Two Pregnancy Care Models in Poland-A Descriptive-Comparative Study.Clin Pract. 2023 Sep 20;13(5):1146-1159. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13050103. Clin Pract. 2023. PMID: 37736939 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of BL23 Acupressure on Pain Among Primiparous Women During the First Stage of Labor: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.Pain Res Manag. 2025 Aug 20;2025:4486038. doi: 10.1155/prm/4486038. eCollection 2025. Pain Res Manag. 2025. PMID: 40880842 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of physical activity on maternal and neonatal outcomes among women with vaginal births-single center prospective cohort study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 3;12:1606471. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1606471. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40529148 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rachmawati I. Maternal reflection on labour pain management and influencing factors. BJM. 2013;20:263–270. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.4.263. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical