Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 31;23(3):1650.
doi: 10.3390/ijms23031650.

Diagnostic Performance of Pancreatic Cytology with the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System: A Systematic Review, before Shifting into the Upcoming WHO International System

Ilias P Nikas  1 , Tanja Proctor  2 , Svenja Seide  2 , Stylianos S Chatziioannou  1 , Jordan P Reynolds  3 , Dimitrios Ntourakis  1
Affiliations

Diagnostic Performance of Pancreatic Cytology with the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System: A Systematic Review, before Shifting into the Upcoming WHO International System

Ilias P Nikas et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) reporting system classifies pancreatobiliary samples into six categories (I-VI), providing guidance for personalized management. As the World Health Organization (WHO) has been preparing an updated reporting system for pancreatobiliary cytopathology, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the risk of malignancy (ROM) of each PSC category, also the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic FNA cytology using the current PSC system. Five databases were investigated with a predefined search algorithm. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the eligible studies for subsequent data extraction. A study quality assessment was also performed. Eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The ROM of the PSC categories I, II, III, IV, V, VI were in the ranges of 8-50%, 0-40%, 28-100%, 0-31%, 82-100%, and 97-100%, respectively. Notably, the ROM IVB ("neoplastic-benign") subcategory showed a 0% ROM. Four of the included studies reported separately the ROMs for the IVO subcategory ("neoplastic-other"; its overall ROM ranged from 0 to 34%) with low (LGA) and high-grade atypia (HGA). ROM for LGA ranged from 4.3 to 19%, whereas ROM for HGA from 64 to 95.2%. When the subcategory IVO with HGA was considered as cytologically positive, together with the categories V and VI, there was a higher sensitivity of pancreatic cytology, at minimal expense of the specificity. Evidence suggests the proposed WHO international system changes-shifting the IVB entities into the "benign/negative for malignancy" category and establishing two new categories, the "pancreatic neoplasm, low-risk/grade" and "pancreatic neoplasm, high-risk/grade"-could stratify pancreatic neoplasms more effectively than the current PSC system.

Keywords: cancer; diagnosis; endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA); immunohistochemistry; molecular; neuroendocrine tumors; pancreas; pancreatic intraductal neoplasms; pathology; sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flowchart of this systematic review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) System and the proposed WHO international system for reporting pancreatobiliary cytology. The neoplasms highlighted with blue are shifted into their new categories of the upcoming WHO system.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chen J., Yang R., Lu Y., Xia Y., Zhou H. Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesion: A Systematic Review. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2012;138:1433–1441. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1268-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puli S.R., Bechtold M.L., Buxbaum J.L., Eloubeidi M.A. How Good Is Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing the Correct Etiology for a Solid Pancreatic Mass? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Pancreas. 2013;42:20–26. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182546e79. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoda R.S., Pitman M.B. Pancreatic Cytology. Surg. Pathol. Clin. 2018;11:563–588. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2018.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pitman M.B., Centeno B.A., Ali S.Z., Genevay M., Stelow E., Mino-Kenudson M., Fernandez-del Castillo C., Max Schmidt C., Brugge W., Layfield L., et al. Standardized Terminology and Nomenclature for Pancreatobiliary Cytology: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2014;42:338–350. doi: 10.1002/dc.23092. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Layfield L.J., Ehya H., Filie A.C., Hruban R.H., Jhala N., Joseph L., Vielh P., Pitman M.B. Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Utilization of Ancillary Studies in the Cytologic Diagnosis of Biliary and Pancreatic Lesions: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines for Pancreatobiliary Cytology. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2014;42:351–362. doi: 10.1002/dc.23093. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types