Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 3;23(3):1748.
doi: 10.3390/ijms23031748.

A Long Journey before Cycling: Regulation of Quiescence Exit in Adult Muscle Satellite Cells

Affiliations
Review

A Long Journey before Cycling: Regulation of Quiescence Exit in Adult Muscle Satellite Cells

Shaopu Zhou et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Skeletal muscle harbors a pool of stem cells called muscle satellite cells (MuSCs) that are mainly responsible for its robust regenerative capacities. Adult satellite cells are mitotically quiescent in uninjured muscles under homeostasis, but they exit quiescence upon injury to re-enter the cell cycle to proliferate. While most of the expanded satellites cells differentiate and fuse to form new myofibers, some undergo self-renewal to replenish the stem cell pool. Specifically, quiescence exit describes the initial transition of MuSCs from quiescence to the first cell cycle, which takes much longer than the time required for subsequent cell cycles and involves drastic changes in cell size, epigenetic and transcriptomic profiles, and metabolic status. It is, therefore, an essential period indispensable for the success of muscle regeneration. Diverse mechanisms exist in MuSCs to regulate quiescence exit. In this review, we summarize key events that occur during quiescence exit in MuSCs and discuss the molecular regulation of this process with an emphasis on multiple levels of intrinsic regulatory mechanisms. A comprehensive understanding of how quiescence exit is regulated will facilitate satellite cell-based muscle regenerative therapies and advance their applications in various disease and aging conditions.

Keywords: cell cycle re-entry; cell growth; checkpoints; mTORC1; quiescence exit; satellite cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Regulatory mechanisms controlling MuSC quiescence maintenance and quiescence exit (activation). The balance between MuSC quiescence and activation is actively regulated via multiple levels of mechanisms. These mechanisms function at signaling, epigenetic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional and metabolic levels, and together determine the fate of MuSCs. Notch signaling is highly active under quiescence, which is replaced by PI3K signaling upon activation. The epigenetic landscape also differs significantly between quiescent and activated MuSCs. The metabolic reprogramming upon activation is orchestrated with utilization of distinct cellular metabolic pathways. In terms of transcriptional landscape, MuSC activation is accompanied with a drastic reduction of Notch targets and induction of many immediate early genes (IEGs). The post-transcriptional mechanisms, including intron retention and the microRNA pathways, are also essential to maintain MuSC quiescence while preserving their rapid response to injury cues.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic showing the progression of MuSC quiescence exit. Quiescent MuSCs are a pool of heterogeneous stem cells with different depths of quiescence. The more dormant MuSC population has slower activation kinetics but typically possesses stronger engraftment capacities. Early activation represents the first stage of quiescence exit, which happens within hours post tissue disruption. Key features of this stage are rapid induction of PI3K signaling and induction of many IEGs. This is followed by a long cell growth stage fueled by continuously increasing mTORC1 activity and coordinated metabolic reprogramming. PI3K and PAXBP1 are two critical regulators during quiescence exit that control an early activation checkpoint and a cell growth checkpoint, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evano B., Tajbakhsh S. Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells in Comfort and Stress. Npj Regen. Med. 2018;3:24. doi: 10.1038/s41536-018-0062-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Relaix F., Bencze M., Borok M.J., Der Vartanian A., Gattazzo F., Mademtzoglou D., Perez-Diaz S., Prola A., Reyes-Fernandez P.C., Rotini A., et al. Perspectives on Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:692. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20760-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sousa-Victor P., García-Prat L., Muñoz-Cánoves P. Control of Satellite Cell Function in Muscle Regeneration and Its Disruption in Ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00421-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Velthoven C.T.J., Rando T.A. Stem Cell Quiescence: Dynamism, Restraint, and Cellular Idling. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24:213–225. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.01.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yin H., Price F., Rudnicki M.A. Satellite Cells and the Muscle Stem Cell Niche. Physiol. Rev. 2013;93:23–67. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources