Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 4;23(3):1808.
doi: 10.3390/ijms23031808.

Tumor-Associated Macrophages/Microglia in Glioblastoma Oncolytic Virotherapy: A Double-Edged Sword

Affiliations
Review

Tumor-Associated Macrophages/Microglia in Glioblastoma Oncolytic Virotherapy: A Double-Edged Sword

Sarah E Blitz et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Oncolytic virotherapy is a rapidly progressing field that uses oncolytic viruses (OVs) to selectively infect malignant cells and cause an antitumor response through direct oncolysis and stimulation of the immune system. Despite demonstrated pre-clinical efficacy of OVs in many cancer types and some favorable clinical results in glioblastoma (GBM) trials, durable increases in overall survival have remained elusive. Recent evidence has emerged that tumor-associated macrophage/microglia (TAM) involvement is likely an important factor contributing to OV treatment failure. It is prudent to note that the relationship between TAMs and OV therapy failures is complex. Canonically activated TAMs (i.e., M1) drive an antitumor response while also inhibiting OV replication and spread. Meanwhile, M2 activated TAMs facilitate an immunosuppressive microenvironment thereby indirectly promoting tumor growth. In this focused review, we discuss the complicated interplay between TAMs and OV therapies in GBM. We review past studies that aimed to maximize effectiveness through immune system modulation-both immunostimulatory and immunosuppressant-and suggest future directions to maximize OV efficacy.

Keywords: glioblastoma (GBM); oncolytic virotherapy; tumor microenvironment; tumor-associated macrophages/microglia (TAMs).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.D.B. has an equity position in Avidea Technologies, Inc., which is commercializing polymer-based drug delivery technologies for immunotherapeutic applications and has an equity position in Treovir LLC, an oHSV clinical stage company and is a member of the POCKiT Diagnostics Board of Scientific Advisors. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the interaction between M1/M2 tumor-associated macrophage/microglia (TAM) polarization with oncolytic viral distribution and tumor growth in glioblastoma multiforme. Elements of the microenvironment influence polarization between TAM subsets of immuno-suppressive M2 and immune-stimulatory M1. Tumors polarize TAMs towards the M2 phenotype, which support tumor growth. Oncolytic virotherapy (OV) inhibits tumor growth through two main mechanisms: direct oncolysis and the antitumor response. The latter is a result of virus-induced polarization towards the M1 phenotype, which creates an immune response against tumor growth. However, this also stimulates an antiviral response, limiting the beneficial effects of OVs. IL interleukin, M-CSF macrophage colony stimulating factor, TGF-β transforming growth factor beta, PGE2 prostaglandin E2, IFN-γ interferon gamma, LPS lipopolysaccharide, Th T helper, Treg T regulatory, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor, CD cluster of differentiation, PD-L1 programmed cell death ligand 1, and TNF-α tumor necrosis factor alpha.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cook M., Chauhan A. Clinical Application of Oncolytic Viruses: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:E7505. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207505. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russell S.J., Peng K.-W., Bell J.C. Oncolytic Virotherapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012;30:658–670. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clemens M.J. Targets and Mechanisms for the Regulation of Translation in Malignant Transformation. Oncogene. 2004;23:3180–3188. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207544. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu Z., Chan M.-K., O-charoenrat P., Eisenberg D.P., Shah J.P., Singh B., Fong Y., Wong R.J. Enhanced Nectin-1 Expression and Herpes Oncolytic Sensitivity in Highly Migratory and Invasive Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:4889–4897. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0309. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson B.D., Nakamura T., Russell S.J., Peng K.-W. High CD46 Receptor Density Determines Preferential Killing of Tumor Cells by Oncolytic Measles Virus. Cancer Res. 2004;64:4919–4926. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0884. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources