Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr-Jun;45(2):182-187.
doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2021.08.014. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

Extracorporeal photopheresis in chronic graft-versus-host disease: clinical description and economic study

Affiliations

Extracorporeal photopheresis in chronic graft-versus-host disease: clinical description and economic study

Dora Fraga Vargas et al. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2023 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Although extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a promising second-line therapy in the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), its use is limited by its high cost. This study aims to describe the clinical evolution of patients who underwent ECP therapy for cGVHD and to perform an economic analysis of the therapy METHODS: This was a case series between 2016 and 2020 describing the clinical response to ECP and a micro-cost analysis of the therapy using time-driven activity-based costing.

Results: Six patients underwent ECP for corticosteroid-dependent cGVHD The cost per ECP session is 14,960.90 Brazilian reais (BRL), which primarily consists of the ECP kit with an activator (82.78%), followed by the hospital's physical structure (14.66%), human resources (2.48%) and exams/inputs (0.08%). The number of sessions performed ranged from 2 to 42. The total cost of the therapy per patient ranged from BRL 30,000 to 500,000.

Conclusion: The response of the patient with cGVHD to treatment with ECP was variable. These micro-costing results can be used to develop remuneration and cost control strategies in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation programs, as well as in further economic studies.

Keywords: Costs and Cost Analysis; Graft vs. Host Disease; Health Evaluation; Micro-costing; Photopheresis; Time-driven activity-based costing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ECP flowchart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tavares R de CB da S, Silva M de M, Bouzas LF da S, Rodrigues MC, Vigorito AC, Funke V, et al. Brazilian workshop model to train investigators in chronic graft-versus-host disease clinical trials according to the 2005-2006 National Institutes of Health recommendations. Rev Bras Hematol E Hemoter. 2011;33(5):358–366. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ, et al. National institutes of health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11(12):945–956. - PubMed
    1. D'Souza A, Fretham C, Lee SJ, Arora M, Brunner J, Chhabra S, et al. Current use of and trends in hematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26(8):e177–e182. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA, et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation. 1974;18(4):295–304. - PubMed
    1. Martin PJ, Storer BE, Inamoto Y, Flowers ME, Carpenter PA, Pidala J, et al. An endpoint associated with clinical benefit after initial treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2017;130(3):360–367. - PMC - PubMed