Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):e059230.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059230.

Recruitment, consent and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials published in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library (1997-2020)

Affiliations
Review

Recruitment, consent and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials published in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library (1997-2020)

Richard M Jacques et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To review the consent, recruitment and retention rates for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) funded by the UK's National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and published in the online NIHR Journals Library between January 1997 and December 2020.

Design: Comprehensive review.

Setting: RCTs funded by the NIHR and published in the NIHR Journals Library.

Data extraction: Information relating to the trial characteristics, sample size, recruitment and retention.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome was the recruitment rate (number of participants recruited per centre per month). Secondary outcomes were the target sample size and whether it was achieved; consent rates (percentage of eligible participants who consented and were randomised) and retention rates (percentage of randomised participants retained and assessed with valid primary outcome data).

Results: This review identified 388 individual RCTs from 379 reports in the NIHR Journals Library. The final recruitment target sample size was achieved in 63% (245/388) of the RCTs. The original recruitment target was revised in 30% (118/388) of trials (downwards in 67% (79/118)). The median recruitment rate (participants per centre per month) was found to be 0.95 (IQR: 0.42-2.60); the median consent rate was 72% (IQR: 50%-88%) and the median retention rate was estimated at 88% (IQR: 80%-97%).

Conclusions: There is considerable variation in the consent, recruitment and retention rates in publicly funded RCTs. Although the majority of (6 out of 10) trials in this review achieved their final target sample; 3 out of 10 trials revised their original target sample size (downwards in 7 out of 10 trials). Investigators should bear this in mind at the planning stage of their study and not be overly optimistic about their recruitment projections.

Keywords: audit; public health; statistics & research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RMJ, RMS and SJW received funding across various projects from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of search and selection process of individually RCTs from the five NIHR journals between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2020. EME, Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; HS&DR, Health Services and Delivery Research; HTA, Health Technology Assessment; NIHR, National Institute for Health Research; PGfAR, Programme Grants for Applied Research; PHR, Public Health Research; RCTs, randomised controlled trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots of recruitment rates by clinical area.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of trials and percentage of trials recruiting 100% and ≥80% of the final sample size target from 1997 to 2020

References

    1. Torgerson DJ, Torgerson CJ. Designing randomised trials in health, education and the social sciences: an introduction. Basingstoke: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2008.
    1. National Institute for Health Research . Annual Report 2019/20 [Internet]. Available: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/about-us/our-contribution-to-research/r... [Accessed 11 Oct 2021].
    1. Kasenda B, von Elm E, You J, et al. . Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. JAMA 2014;311:1045–52. 10.1001/jama.2014.1361 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amstutz A, Schandelmaier S, Frei R, et al. . Discontinuation and non-publication of randomised clinical trials supported by the main public funding body in Switzerland: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016216. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016216 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sully BGO, Julious SA, Nicholl J. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 2013;14:166. 10.1186/1745-6215-14-166 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources