Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 1;48(4):441-448.
doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003397.

Review of Lasers and Energy-Based Devices for Skin Rejuvenation and Scar Treatment With Histologic Correlations

Stella X Chen  1 , Judy Cheng  2 , Jacqueline Watchmaker  3 , Jeffrey S Dover  3   4 , Hye Jin Chung  5
Affiliations
Review

Review of Lasers and Energy-Based Devices for Skin Rejuvenation and Scar Treatment With Histologic Correlations

Stella X Chen et al. Dermatol Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Lasers and energy-based devices (EBD) are popular treatments for skin rejuvenation and resurfacing. Achieving desired outcomes and avoiding complications require understanding the effects of these devices at a histologic level. Currently, no comprehensive review summarizing the histologic effects of laser and energy-based treatments exists.

Objective: To describe how lasers and EBD alter skin histology and improve the overall understanding of these devices.

Materials and methods: A PubMed search was conducted for studies with histologic analysis of fractional picosecond laser, fractional radiofrequency microneedling, nonablative lasers, and ablative lasers.

Results: Fractional picosecond lasers induce intraepidermal and/or dermal vacuoles from laser-induced optical breakdown. Fractional radiofrequency microneedling delivers thermal energy to the dermis while sparing the epidermis, making it safer for patients with darker skin phototypes. Fractional nonablative lasers induce conical zones of coagulation of the epidermis and upper dermis. Ablative lasers vaporize the stratum corneum down to the dermis. Traditional ablative lasers cause diffuse vaporization while fractional ablative lasers generate columns of tissue ablation.

Conclusion: Lasers and EBD are effective for skin resurfacing and rejuvenation and have different mechanisms with disparate targets in the skin. Safe and effective use of devices requires understanding the histologic laser-tissue interaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nielson CB, Harb JN, Motaparthi K. Education in cosmetic procedural dermatology: resident experiences and perceptions. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2019;12:E70–E72.
    1. Zheng Z, Goo B, Kim DY, Kang JS, et al. Histometric analysis of skin-radiofrequency interaction using a fractionated microneedle delivery system. Dermatol Surg 2014;40:134–41.
    1. Taheri A, Mansoori P, Sandoval LF, Feldman SR, et al. Entrance and propagation pattern of high-frequency electrical currents in biological tissues as applied to fractional skin rejuvenation using penetrating electrodes. Skin Res Technol 2014;20:270–3.
    1. Na J, Zheng Z, Dannaker C, Lee SE, et al. Electromagnetic initiation and propagation of bipolar radiofrequency tissue reactions via invasive non-insulated microneedle electrodes. Sci Rep 2015;5:16735.
    1. Manuskiatti W, Pattanaprichakul P, Inthasotti S, Sitthinamsuwan P, et al. Thermal response of in vivo human skin to fractional radiofrequency microneedle device. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:6939018.

LinkOut - more resources