Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Complications of Intra-Articular (AO type B, C) Distal Humerus Fractures in Adults: A Retrospective Review
- PMID: 35165554
- PMCID: PMC8828691
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21094
Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Complications of Intra-Articular (AO type B, C) Distal Humerus Fractures in Adults: A Retrospective Review
Abstract
Introduction Treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus is challenging due to their complexity, comminution, and associated complications. The evolution of surgical approaches and the design of elbow-specific implants over the last decades have failed to improve clinical and radiological outcomes. Studies are sparse regarding the long-term influence of surgical treatment of these types of fractures in the upper limb function. The purpose of the current study was to retrospectively review the long-term functional outcome and complications of all intraarticular (AO type B, C) distal humerus fractures treated surgically in a university hospital during the last 25 years. Material and methods The study included patients who were surgically treated for an intra-articular distal humerus fracture between March 1991 and May 2016. Our initial search, using ICD-10 codes, identified 63 patients in the specific time period. Twelve patients had died, nine declined to participate, eight had emigrated, nine could not be located and one patient was excluded as he suffered from quadriplegia unrelated to the initial injury. The remaining 25 patients (mean age at surgery 44.2±19.67) were included in a follow-up study protocol. Functional outcome was evaluated according to Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH). Pain was assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction. Perioperative and late complications were recorded as well. Results The average follow-up was 158.16 ± 73.73 months. The average score was 89.4 ± 12.36 for MEPS, 42.68 ± 4.03 for OES, and 8.1 ± 15.38 for the QuickDASH. The patient satisfaction was rated 3.8 ± 1.08 on average. The mean flexion of the affected elbow was 137.6 ± 12.68 degrees while extension deficit was present in 14/25 patients, with a mean of 8.6 ± 8.96 degrees. We did not observe any mal- or non-unions. The re-operation rate was 32% primarily due to stiffness and irritation from the hardware. We noticed one spontaneously resolved ulnar nerve palsy, one combined radial, and ulnar nerve palsy after extensive arthrolysis that also resolved two cases of heterotopic ossification, one case of implant failure, and two cases of infection - one superficial, which was managed with antibiotics, and the other was deep managed with surgical drainage. Conclusions In our series, we found a satisfying range of motion, good functional outcome, and adequate ability to perform daily activities at a very long follow-up. Posttraumatic arthritis, whenever present, does not seriously affect functional performance. Level of evidence: IV.
Keywords: ao type b-c; complications; distal humerus; internal fixation; intra-articular fractures; long-term follow up.
Copyright © 2022, Tyllianakis et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Skinny wire and locking plate fixation for comminuted intra-articular distal humerus fractures: a technical trick and case series.JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2020 Dec 15;1(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2020.11.007. eCollection 2021 Feb. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2020. PMID: 37588629 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome after internal fixation of intraarticular distal humerus (AO type B & C) fractures: Preliminary results with anatomical distal humerus LCP system.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):63-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 15. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017. PMID: 28360500 Free PMC article.
-
[AO type 13-C distal humerus fractures. Results of surgical treatment].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79(6):529-34. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012. PMID: 23286686 Czech.
-
Clinical Outcomes and Management Strategies for Capitellum and Trochlea Fractures: A Systematic Review.Orthop Res Rev. 2024 Jun 26;16:179-197. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S472482. eCollection 2024. Orthop Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 38947420 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Are outcomes after fixation of distal humerus coronal shear fractures affected by surgical approach? A systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES Int. 2022 Sep 13;6(6):1054-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.011. eCollection 2022 Nov. JSES Int. 2022. PMID: 36353417 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of internal fixation stability of distal humerus C-type fractures based on musculoskeletal dynamics: finite element analysis under dynamic loading.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 17;20(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05876-z. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40380213 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment. Robinson CM, Hill RM, Jacobs N, Dall G, Court-Brown CM. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:38–47. - PubMed
-
- Epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of 2,011 humeral fractures: data from the Swedish Fracture Register. Bergdahl C, Ekholm C, Wennergren D, Nilsson F, Möller M. https://doi.org/ BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:159. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, et al. https://doi.org/ J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:0–133. - PubMed
-
- Transarticular shear fractures of the distal humerus. Ashwood N, Verma M, Hamlet M, Garlapati A, Fogg Q. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.061. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:46–52. - PubMed
-
- Treatment of high-energy supracondylar/intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus. Cannada L, Loeffler B, Zadnik MB, Eglseder AW. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22381415/ J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011;20:230–235. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials