Insertional versus non-insertional tendoachilles tears: a comparative analysis of various predisposing factors and outcome following a repair
- PMID: 35165787
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05337-w
Insertional versus non-insertional tendoachilles tears: a comparative analysis of various predisposing factors and outcome following a repair
Abstract
Background: Association of tendon degeneration, pre-existing posterior heel pain, Haglund's bump, retrocalcaneal spur, and mode of injury varies for the insertional and non-insertional type of tendoachilles tears (TA).
Purpose: The study compares the various predisposing factors that determine the distinct type of TA tear and the outcome following a repair.
Methods: This is a retrospective study of the patients who underwent tendoachilles repair during January 2012-June 2018. Patients above 18 years with a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Patients with calcaneal tuberosity avulsions, prior surgeries, and open injuries were excluded. Patients were divided into groups 1 (insertional tears (IT)) and 2 (non-insertional tears (NIT)), and further subdivided based on the tendon degeneration (as D-degenerative and N-normal sub types) from ultrasound findings. AOFAS score and predisposing factors like degeneration, posterior heel pain, Haglund's bump, spur, and mechanism of injury were compared between the groups.
Results: The study included N = 146 with a mean age of 51.6 years and mean follow-up of 38.6 (range 24 to 96) months. IT associated with degeneration (IT-D) had a trivial fall as the predominant mechanism (P < 0.001). All patients had significant postoperative improvement of scores with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.59) and subgroups (P = 0.27).75.34% had degenerative tendon, of which 64.5% were in the IT group and the rest in the NIT group (P = 0.02). 51.4% patients had a Haglund bump in the IT group and n.s. (P = 0.9). Forty-seven percent of patients had pre-existing posterior heel pain, 68% in IT and 32% in NIT (P = 0.04). Subgroup analysis revealed 65% of patients were in the IT-D subgroup (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Predisposing factors like posterior heel pain, tendon degeneration, and trivial trauma have a strong propensity for insertional TA tear. In contrast, the prominence of Haglund's bump does not predispose to a distinct type of TA tears. The outcome following a surgical repair-yields good results with no difference between the two groups.
Keywords: Haglund’s bump; Insertional tendoachilles tear; Non-insertional tendoachilles tear; Posterior heel pain; Retrocalcaneal spur; Tendinopathy; Tendon degeneration.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
References
-
- Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Rolf C, Felländer-Tsai L, Mattila VM (2014) Acute Achilles tendon ruptures- incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012. Am J Sports Med 42(10):2419–2423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514540599 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pedowitz D, Kirwan G (2013) Achilles tendon ruptures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 6(4):285–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-013-9185-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Maniscalco P, Bertone C, Bonci E, Donelli L, Pagliantini L (1998) Titanium anchors for the repair of distal Achilles tendon ruptures : preliminary report of a new surgical technique. J Foot Ankle Surg 37(2):96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-2516(98)80087-2 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schipper ON, Anderson RB, Cohen BE (2018) Outcomes after primary repair of insertional ruptures of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Int 39(6):664–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718758257 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gross CE, Ii JAN (2016) Acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle 37(2):233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100715619606 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous