The effect on handgrip strength of low-frequency percutaneous electric stimulation applied to the median and cubital nerves: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial
- PMID: 35166034
- DOI: 10.1002/ar.24887
The effect on handgrip strength of low-frequency percutaneous electric stimulation applied to the median and cubital nerves: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial
Abstract
Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) consists of applying an electric current of <1,000 Hz to different neuromuscular structures through acupuncture needles. Currently, there is controversy surrounding the effect of PENS on muscle strength in the scientific literature. The main objective was to assess the effect of PENS applied to the median and cubital nerves on the maximum handgrip strength (MHS) compared to sham stimulation, as well as to determine the safety of the intervention. A parallel, randomized, double-blind controlled trial in a sample of 20 healthy subjects. Participants were randomly allocated in the experimental (n = 10) and control (n = 10) groups. A blinded researcher measured MHS. Measurements of MHS of the dominant hand were taken at four time points: preintervention, immediately postintervention, 24 hr after the intervention, and at a 10-day follow-up. A 10-Hz percutaneous electrical current stimulation was employed. The control group also received the same puncture method but with no electric stimulation. Compared to baseline, the MHS decreased 10.4% (SEM = 3.2, p = .02) in the PENS group at 24 hr postintervention, with no differences observed between baseline and at 10 days postintervention. No changes in grip strength were observed at any time point in the sham group. To sum up, PENS decreased MHS at 24 hr postintervention, which does not persist 10 days after the stimulation. PENS can be considered a safe technique. Trials with larger sample sizes are required to corroborate the findings of this study. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT, NCT04662229, filed on March 12th of 2020.
Keywords: electroacupuncture; grip strength; motor activation; percutaneous electric stimulation.
© 2022 The Authors. The Anatomical Record published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for Anatomy.
Similar articles
-
20-kHz alternating current stimulation: effects on motor and somatosensory thresholds.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Feb 19;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00661-x. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 32075666 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of high-frequency alternating current transcutaneous stimulation over muscle strength: a controlled pilot study.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Nov 12;15(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0443-2. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018. PMID: 30419966 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Immediate Effect of Patterned Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulation on Pain and Muscle Activation in Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain.J Athl Train. 2016 Feb;51(2):118-28. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.4.06. Epub 2016 Mar 11. J Athl Train. 2016. PMID: 26967547 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation--electroacupuncture by another name? A comparative review.Acupunct Med. 2001 Jun;19(1):32-5. doi: 10.1136/aim.19.1.32. Acupunct Med. 2001. PMID: 11471581 Review.
-
Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Pain. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pain Med. 2022 Aug 1;23(8):1387-1400. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac027. Pain Med. 2022. PMID: 35167691
Cited by
-
Effects of Adding Four Sessions of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation to an Exercise Program in Patients with Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Clin Med. 2024 May 28;13(11):3171. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113171. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892882 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Álvarez-Prats, D., Carvajal-Fernández, Ó., Pérez-Mallada, N., & Minaya-Muñoz, F. (2019). Changes in maximal isometric quadriceps strength after the application of ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation of the femoral nerve: A case series. Revista Fisioterpia Invasiva/Journal of Invasive Techniques in Physical Therapy, 02(01), 39-45.
-
- Cai, Y., Zhang, C. S., Liu, S., Wen, Z., Zhang, A. L., Guo, X., Lu, C., & Xue, C. C. (2017). Electroacupuncture for poststroke spasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(12), 2578-2589.e4.
-
- Chen, J. T., Chung, K. C., Hou, C. R., Kuan, T. S., Chen, S. M., & Hong, C. Z. (2001). Inhibitory effect of dry needling on the spontaneous electrical activity recorded from myofascial trigger spots of rabbit skeletal muscle. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80(10), 729-735.
-
- Cummings, M. (2001). Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-electroacupuncture by another name? A comparative review. Acupuncture in Medicine: Journal of British Medical Acupuncture Society, 19(1), 32-35.
-
- de la Cruz-Torres, B., Barrera-García-Martín, I., & Albornoz-Cabello, M. (2019). Immediate effects of ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation versus physical exercise on performance of the flexor hallucis longus muscle in professional dancers: A randomised clinical trial. Acupuncture in Medicine, 37(2), 91-97.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical