Posthospitalization Follow-Up of Patients With Heart Failure Using eHealth Solutions: Restricted Systematic Review
- PMID: 35166680
- PMCID: PMC8889479
- DOI: 10.2196/32946
Posthospitalization Follow-Up of Patients With Heart Failure Using eHealth Solutions: Restricted Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome with high incidence rates, a substantial symptom and treatment burden, and a significant risk of readmission within 30 days after hospitalization. The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the significance of using eHealth interventions to follow up on the care needs of patients with HF to support self-care, increase quality of life (QoL), and reduce readmission rates during the transition between hospital and home.
Objective: The aims of this review are to summarize research on the content and delivery modes of HF posthospitalization eHealth interventions, explore patient adherence to the interventions, and examine the effects on the patient outcomes of self-care, QoL, and readmissions.
Methods: A restricted systematic review study design was used. Literature searches and reviews followed the (PRISMA-S) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search extension checklist, and the CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published between 2015 and 2020. The review process involved 3 groups of researchers working in pairs. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the included studies' methodological quality. A thematic analysis method was used to analyze data extracted from the studies.
Results: A total of 18 studies were examined in this review. The studies were published between 2015 and 2019, with 56% (10/18) of them published in the United States. Of the 18 studies, 16 (89%) were randomized controlled trials, and 14 (78%) recruited patients upon hospital discharge to eHealth interventions lasting from 14 days to 12 months. The studies involved structured telephone calls, interactive voice response, and telemonitoring and included elements of patient education, counseling, social and emotional support, and self-monitoring of symptoms and vital signs. Of the 18 studies, 11 (61%) provided information on patient adherence, and the adherence levels were 72%-99%. When used for posthospitalization follow-up of patients with HF, eHealth interventions can positively affect QoL, whereas its impact is less evident for self-care and readmissions.
Conclusions: This review suggests that patients with HF should receive prompt follow-up after hospitalization and eHealth interventions have the potential to improve these patients' QoL. Patient adherence in eHealth follow-up trials shows promise for successful future interventions and adherence research. Further studies are warranted to examine the effects of eHealth interventions on self-care and readmissions among patients with HF.
Keywords: adherence; eHealth; heart failure; patient outcome; posthospitalization follow-up; review.
©Ingvild Margreta Morken, Marianne Storm, Jon Arne Søreide, Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad, Bjørg Karlsen, Anne Marie Lunde Husebø. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 15.02.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of eHealth Self-management Interventions in Patients With Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 26;24(9):e38697. doi: 10.2196/38697. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 36155484 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
-
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35802350 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30229557 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the nurse-assisted eHealth intervention 'eHealth@Hospital-2-Home' on self-care by patients with heart failure and colorectal cancer post-hospital discharge: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10508-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38178097 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing a nurse-assisted eHealth intervention posthospital discharge in adult patients with non-communicable diseases: a protocol for a feasibility study.BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 3;13(8):e069599. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069599. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37536967 Free PMC article.
-
Designing a Future eHealth Service for Posthospitalization Self-management Support in Long-term Illness: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Feb 6;10:e39391. doi: 10.2196/39391. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023. PMID: 36745492 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the effectiveness of eHealth interventions in treating Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) outcomes: a systematic review.Crit Care. 2024 Sep 27;28(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05089-6. Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 39334262 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of eHealth Self-management Interventions in Patients With Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 26;24(9):e38697. doi: 10.2196/38697. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 36155484 Free PMC article.
References
-
- GBD 2017 DiseaseInjury IncidencePrevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789–858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(18)32279-7 S0140-6736(18)32279-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Koudstaal S, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Denaxas S, Gho JM, Shah AD, Yu N, Patel RS, Gale CP, Hoes AW, Cleland JG, Asselbergs FW, Hemingway H. Prognostic burden of heart failure recorded in primary care, acute hospital admissions, or both: a population-based linked electronic health record cohort study in 2.1 million people. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Sep;19(9):1119–27. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.709. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.709. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CS, Lyon AR, McMurray JJ, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GM, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A, ESC Scientific Document Group 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599–726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.6358045 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nordfonn OK, Morken IM, Bru LE, Larsen AI, Husebø AM. Burden of treatment in patients with chronic heart failure - A cross-sectional study. Heart Lung. 2021;50(3):369–74. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.02.003. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0147-9563(21)00026-1 S0147-9563(21)00026-1 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous