Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 15;17(2):e0263216.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263216. eCollection 2022.

Unveiling teachers' beliefs on visual cognition and learning styles of deaf and hard of hearing students: A Portuguese-Swedish study

Affiliations

Unveiling teachers' beliefs on visual cognition and learning styles of deaf and hard of hearing students: A Portuguese-Swedish study

Filipa M Rodrigues et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Vision is considered a privileged sensory channel for deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) students to learn, and, naturally, they recognize themselves as visual learners. This assumption also seems widespread among schoolteachers, which led us to analyse the intersection between teachers' beliefs on deaf and hard of hearing students' academic achievement, visual skills, attentional difficulties, and the perceived importance of image display in class. An online survey was designed to analyse the beliefs of the schoolteachers about the deaf and hard of hearing students learning in educational settings from Portugal and Sweden. Participated 133 teachers, 70 Portuguese and 63 Swedish, from the preschool to the end of mandatory education (ages 3-18) with several years of experience. The content analysis and the computed SPSS statistical significance tests reveal that surveyed teachers believe that deaf and hard of hearing students have better visual skills when compared with their hearing peers yet show divergent beliefs about visual attentional processes. Within the teachers' perceptions on learning barriers to DHH students, the distractibility and cognitive effort factors were highlighted, among communicational difficulties in class. Conclusions about the prevalence of learning misconceptions in teachers from both countries analysed, corroborate previous studies on neuromyths in education, and bring novelty to Deaf Education field. The work of translation of scientific knowledge, teacher training updating, and partnership between researchers and educators are also urgently needed in special education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Teachers’ perceptions about the language performance levels of DHH students (N = 133).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Teachers’ perceptions about the mathematics performance levels of DHH students (N = 133).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Teachers´ perceptions about DHH students’ visual skills (N = 133).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Teachers’ perceptions about increased visual skills manifestation ages (N = 133).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Teachers’ conceptions about DHH learners’ attentional difficulties in class (N = 133).
Fig 6
Fig 6. Teachers’ conceptions about the importance given to the visual material exhibition in classroom walls (N = 133).
Fig 7
Fig 7. Teachers’ confidence degrees about their pedagogical choices (N = 133).
Fig 8
Fig 8. Training modalities selected by teachers (N = 133).

References

    1. Davies P. What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Education Studies. 1999. 47:108–121. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00106 - DOI
    1. Marschark M, Paivio A, Spencer LJ, et al.. Don’t Assume Deaf Students are Visual Learners. Center for Education Research Partnerships, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY. 2017. 29 (1). doi: 10.1007/s10882-016-9494-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spencer PE, Marschark M. Evidence-based practice in educating deaf and hard-of-hearing students. International Journal of Audiology. 2011. 50(10):783. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.602118 - DOI
    1. Rogowsky BA, Calhoun BM, Tallal P. Providing Instruction Based on Students’ Learning Style Preferences Does Not Improve Learning. Front Psychol. 2020. 11:164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00164 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dekker S, Lee NC, Howard-Jones P, Jolles J. Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology. 2012. (3):429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types