Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 14;139(15):2273-2284.
doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014309.

Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies

Affiliations

Guiding the global evolution of cytogenetic testing for hematologic malignancies

Yassmine M N Akkari et al. Blood. .

Abstract

Cytogenetics has long represented a critical component in the clinical evaluation of hematologic malignancies. Chromosome banding studies provide a simultaneous snapshot of genome-wide copy number and structural variation, which have been shown to drive tumorigenesis, define diseases, and guide treatment. Technological innovations in sequencing have ushered in our present-day clinical genomics era. With recent publications highlighting novel sequencing technologies as alternatives to conventional cytogenetic approaches, we, an international consortium of laboratory geneticists, pathologists, and oncologists, describe herein the advantages and limitations of both conventional chromosome banding and novel sequencing technologies and share our considerations on crucial next steps to implement these novel technologies in the global clinical setting for a more accurate cytogenetic evaluation, which may provide improved diagnosis and treatment management. Considering the clinical, logistic, technical, and financial implications, we provide points to consider for the global evolution of cytogenetic testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sequencing coverage depth needed for LOD in the range of 1% to 25% calculated based on confidence interval at 0.95 with threshold of minimum 3 unique sequencing reads according to the binomial distribution.

References

    1. Taylor J, Xiao W, Abdel-Wahab O. Diagnosis and classification of hematologic malignancies on the basis of genetics. Blood. 2017;130(4):410–423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nangalia J, Campbell PJ. Genome sequencing during a patient's journey through cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(22):2145–2156. - PubMed
    1. Granada I, Palomo L, Ruiz-Xivillé N, Mallo M, Solé F. Cytogenetics in the genomic era. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2020;33(3):101196. - PubMed
    1. Ribeiro IP, Melo JB, Carreira IM. Cytogenetics and cytogenomics evaluation in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(19):4711. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120(12):2454–2465. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types