Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;50(11):1234-1239.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.01.031. Epub 2022 Feb 12.

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium carriage in patients who have traveled in foreign countries: A single center 5-year prospective study

Affiliations

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium carriage in patients who have traveled in foreign countries: A single center 5-year prospective study

A Lomont et al. Am J Infect Control. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Numerous patients carrying carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) and/or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) in France have previously travelled abroad. The risk of spreading CPE/VRE by patients who have stayed abroad without hospitalization is underexplored. This prompted us to screen and isolate all patients who travelled abroad in the previous 12 months upon admission to our hospital. Our aim was to evaluate the efficiency of this CPE/VRE-related risk policy.

Methods: From 2014 to 2018, patients who had travelled abroad in the previous year before their admission underwent microbiological screening and were pre-emptively isolated. Contact precautions were verified and CPE/VRE cross-transmission events investigated.

Results: Among 1,780 screened patients, 59 (3.3%) were colonized with CPE and/or VRE, of whom 17 (29.3%) were not hospitalized abroad. Nine generated 18 readmissions. No episodes of CPE/VRE cross-transmission were related to patients with a stay abroad without hospitalization, whereas 2 patients hospitalized abroad generated one episode each, despite implementation of contact precautions reaching values from 73.6% to 87.5%.

Discussion: Throughout 17 admissions and 18 readmissions, patients who stayed abroad without hospitalization represented a true risk of spreading CPE/VRE, without generating cross-transmission.

Conclusions: Our strategy of CPE/VRE-related risk policy is successful.

Keywords: Contact precautions; Cross transmission; Rectal screening; Survey policy.

PubMed Disclaimer