Review

. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):e051775.

doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051775.

Healthcare workers' perceptions and attitudes towards the UK's COVID-19 vaccination programme: a rapid qualitative appraisal

Louisa Manby¹, Anna Dowrick², Amelia Karia¹, Laura Maio^{1

3}, Caroline Buck⁴, Georgina Singleton^{1

5}, Sasha Lewis-Jackson², Inayah Uddin¹, Samantha Vanderslott⁶, Sam Martin^{1

6}, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros⁷

Affiliations

¹ Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK.
² Medical Sociology and Health Experiences Research Group, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
³ Dementia UK, London, UK.
⁴ Department of Behavioural Science & Health, University College London, London, UK.
⁵ National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia Health Services Research Centre, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
⁶ Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
⁷ Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK c.vindrola@ucl.ac.uk.

PMID: 35168970
PMCID: PMC8852238
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051775

Review

Healthcare workers' perceptions and attitudes towards the UK's COVID-19 vaccination programme: a rapid qualitative appraisal

Louisa Manby et al. BMJ Open. 2022.

. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):e051775.

doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051775.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK.
² Medical Sociology and Health Experiences Research Group, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
³ Dementia UK, London, UK.
⁴ Department of Behavioural Science & Health, University College London, London, UK.
⁵ National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia Health Services Research Centre, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
⁶ Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
⁷ Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK c.vindrola@ucl.ac.uk.

PMID: 35168970
PMCID: PMC8852238
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051775

Abstract

Objectives: While there is research relating to perceptions of vaccines among healthcare workers (HCWs), the evidence base in relation to COVID-19 remains limited. The aim of this study was to explore HCWs' perceptions and attitudes towards vaccines and the COVID-19 vaccination programme in the UK, including their expectations and views on promoting vaccination to others.

Design: This study was designed as a rapid qualitative appraisal, integrating data from a review of UK policies and guidance on COVID-19 vaccination with data from in-depth semistructured telephone interviews with frontline HCWs in the UK. Data were analysed using framework analysis.

Participants: Interviews were carried out with a purposive sample of HCWs from two large London-based hospital Trusts (n=24) and 24 government policies, and guidelines on the vaccination programme were reviewed.

Results: The level of uncertainty about the long-term safety of vaccines and efficacy against mutant strains made it difficult for HCWs to balance the benefits against the risks of vaccination. HCWs felt that government decisions on vaccine rollout had not been supported by evidence-based science, and this impacted their level of trust and confidence in the programme. The spread of misinformation online also impacted HCWs' attitudes towards vaccination, particularly among junior level and black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) HCWs. Most HCWs felt encouraged to promote vaccination to their patients, and the majority said they would advocate vaccination or engage in conversations about vaccination with others when relevant.

Conclusion: In order to improve HCWs' trust and confidence in the UK's COVID-19 vaccination programme, there needs to be clarity about what is known and not known about the vaccines and transparency around the evidence-base supporting government decisions on vaccine rollout. Effort is also needed to dispel the spread of vaccine-related misinformation online and to address specific concerns, particularly among BAME and junior-level HCWs.

Keywords: COVID-19; health services administration & management; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Cited by

Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccination Intention among Health Care Workers in France: A Qualitative Study.
Bourreau C, Baron A, Schwarzinger M, Alla F, Cambon L, Donzel Godinot L, CoVaMax Study Group. Bourreau C, et al. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 4;10(10):1661. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101661. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36298526 Free PMC article.
Exploration of the Experience of Care Home Managers of COVID-19 Vaccination Programme Implementation and Uptake by Residents and Staff in Care Homes in Northern Ireland.
Craig L, Haloub R, Reid H, Masson D, Mccalmont H, Fodey K, Conway BR, Lattyak WJ, Lattyak EA, Bain A, Al-Azzam S, Aldeyab MA. Craig L, et al. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Oct 10;9(10):1160. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101160. Vaccines (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34696268 Free PMC article.
Marginalisation and distrust in the context of the COVID-19 vaccination programme: experiences of communities in a northern UK city region.
Gillibrand S, Kapadia D, Watkinson R, Issa B, Kwaku-Odoi C, Sanders C. Gillibrand S, et al. BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):853. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18308-0. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38504230 Free PMC article.
Modifiable social and structural factors influence COVID-19 vaccine intention among frontline workers in the Midwestern USA: a community-engaged survey study.
de-Winton Cummings PJ, Gonzalez Bravo C, Dukes KC, Wilks AD, Ahlers CD, Casado Castillo FE, Courtney A, Elliott-Wherry AN, Knobbe JE, Pineiro-Falcon NM, Schaeffer SE, Tillinghast S, Tovar EF, Villa AT, Carvour ML. de-Winton Cummings PJ, et al. BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 28;3(1):e000859. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000859. eCollection 2025. BMJ Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40166606 Free PMC article.
Healthcare workers' perspectives on the COVID-19 vaccine and boosters for themselves, their patients, and their communities: a mixed methods study.
Burrowes SAB, Casey SM, Dobbins S, Hall T, Ma M, Bano R, Drainoni ML, Schechter-Perkins EM, Garofalo C, Perkins RB, Pierre-Joseph N. Burrowes SAB, et al. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022 Dec 25:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10389-022-01793-1. Online ahead of print. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022. PMID: 36588660 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. World Health Organisation . Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Dashboard, 2021. Available: https://covid19.who.int/ [Accessed 30 Oct 2021].
1. Department of Health & Social Care . UK COVID-19 vaccines delivery plan, 2021. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa...
1. Mahase E. Covid-19: what do we know about the late stage vaccine candidates? BMJ 2020;371:m4576. 10.1136/bmj.m4576 - DOI - PubMed
1. World Health Organisation . Report on the SAGE Working group on vaccine hesitancy, 2014. Available: https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/1_Report_WOR... [Accessed 21 Feb 2021].
1. Yaqub O, Castle-Clarke S, Sevdalis N, et al. . Attitudes to vaccination: a critical review. Soc Sci Med 2014;112:1–11. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.018 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Substances

Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Healthcare workers' perceptions and attitudes towards the UK's COVID-19 vaccination programme: a rapid qualitative appraisal

Affiliations

Healthcare workers' perceptions and attitudes towards the UK's COVID-19 vaccination programme: a rapid qualitative appraisal

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Medical