Protocol for individual participant data meta-analysis of interventions for post-traumatic stress
- PMID: 35168977
- PMCID: PMC8852733
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054830
Protocol for individual participant data meta-analysis of interventions for post-traumatic stress
Abstract
Introduction: Several evidence-based treatments are effective for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), yet a substantial proportion of patients do not respond or dropout of treatment. We describe the protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) aimed at assessing the effectiveness and adverse effects of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy interventions for treating PTSD. Additionally, we seek to examine moderators and predictors of treatment outcomes.
Method and analysis: This IPD-MA includes randomised controlled trials comparing psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy interventions for PTSD. PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, PTSDpubs and CENTRAL will be screened up till the 11th of January 2021. The target population is adults with above-threshold baseline PTSD symptoms on any standardised self-report measure. Trials will only be eligible if at least 70% of the study sample have been diagnosed with PTSD by means of a structured clinical interview. The primary outcomes of this IPD-MA are PTSD symptom severity, and response rate. Secondary outcomes include treatment dropout and adverse effects. Two independent reviewers will screen major bibliographic databases and past reviews. Authors will be contacted to contribute their participant-level datasets. Datasets will be merged into a master dataset. A one-stage IPD-MA will be conducted focusing on the effects of psychological and pharmacological interventions on PTSD symptom severity, response rate, treatment dropout and adverse effects. Subsequent analyses will focus on examining the effect of moderators and predictors of treatment outcomes. These will include sociodemographic, treatment-related, symptom-related, resilience, intervention, trauma and combat-related characteristics. By determining the individual factors that influence the effectiveness of specific PTSD treatments, we will gain insight into personalised treatment options for PTSD.
Ethics and dissemination: Specific ethics approval for an IPD-MA is not required as this study entails secondary analysis of existing anonymised data. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations.
Keywords: adult psychiatry; mental health; protocols & guidelines.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
What works for whom and why? Treatment effects and their moderators among forcibly displaced people receiving psychological and psychosocial interventions: study protocol for an individual patient data meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e078473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078473. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38309750 Free PMC article.
-
Couple and family therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 4;12(12):CD011257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011257.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31797352 Free PMC article.
-
EMDR v. other psychological therapies for PTSD: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.Psychol Med. 2024 Jun;54(8):1580-1588. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723003446. Epub 2024 Jan 4. Psychol Med. 2024. PMID: 38173121
-
Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents (Review).Evid Based Child Health. 2013 May;8(3):1004-116. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1916. Evid Based Child Health. 2013. PMID: 23877914 Review.
-
Augmentation of trauma-focused psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2025 May 21;15(5):e090571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090571. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40398931 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Exploring study dropout in drug trials for adults with PTSD: insights from a conventional and individual participant data meta-analysis.Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2504839. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2504839. Epub 2025 May 28. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025. PMID: 40434049 Free PMC article.
-
Opportunities for improving data sharing and FAIR data practices to advance global mental health.Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2023 Mar 3;10:e14. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.7. eCollection 2023. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2023. PMID: 37860102 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Charting neuroethics discourse in Africa: A scoping review of ethical issues of neuroscience research in Africa.IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2025 Jun 18;19:174-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.06.002. eCollection 2025 Dec. IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40642291 Free PMC article.
-
Data sharing and re-use in the traumatic stress field: An international survey of trauma researchers.Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2254118. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2254118. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023. PMID: 37703089 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous