Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):e059675.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059675.

Multicentre observational status-epilepticus registry: protocol for ICTAL

Affiliations

Multicentre observational status-epilepticus registry: protocol for ICTAL

Gwenaelle Jacq et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Status epilepticus (SE) is a common life-threatening neurological emergency that can cause long-term impairments. Overall outcomes remain poor. Major efforts are required to clarify the epidemiology of SE and the determinants of outcomes, thereby identifying targets for improved management.

Methods and analysis: ICTAL Registry is a multicentre open cohort of critically ill patients with convulsive, non-convulsive or psychogenic non-epileptic SE. Observational methods are applied to collect uniform data. The goal of the ICTAL Registry is to collect high-quality information on a large number of patients, thereby allowing elucidation of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in mortality and morbidity. The registry structure is modular, with a large core data set and the opportunity for research teams to create satellite data sets for observational or interventional studies (eg, cohort multiple randomised controlled trials, cross-sectional studies and short-term and long-term longitudinal outcome studies). The availability of core data will hasten patient recruitment to studies, while also decreasing costs. Importantly, the vast amount of data from a large number of patients will allow valid subgroup analyses, which are expected to identify patient populations requiring specific treatment strategies. The results of the studies will have a broad spectrum of application, particularly given the multidisciplinary approach used by the IctalGroup research network.

Ethics and dissemination: The ICTAL Registry protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society (#CE_SRLF 19-68 and 19-68a). Patients or their relatives/proxies received written information to the use of the retrospectively collected and pseudonymised data, in compliance with French law. Prospectively included patients receive written consent form as soon as they recover decision-making competency; if they refuse consent, they are excluded from the registry. Data from the registry will be disseminated via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration number: NCT03457831.

Keywords: adult intensive & critical care; adult neurology; epidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: NM received consulting fees from Amomed and grants from Air liquide. PB received financial support from Sedana Medical. J-BL received honoraria from BD and Zoll. None of the other authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ICTAL Registry structure. The registry has a modular structure, with a vast core set of variables and the ability to attach satellite databases adding the variables needed to investigate specific issues. Possible study designs are indicated, with grey for retrospective studies, medium blue for prospective studies, light blue for interventional studies and dark blue for observational studies. The differences in the sizes of the circles reflect differences in the sizes of the satellite databases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ICTAL registry core data set.ASMs, antiseizure medication; EEG, electroencephalographic; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Scale; ICU, intensive care unit; LODS, Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score; SAPs II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score version II; SE, status epilepticus; STESS, Status Epilepticus Severity Score.

References

    1. Trinka E, Cock H, Hesdorffer D, et al. . A definition and classification of status epilepticus--Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus. Epilepsia 2015;56:1515–23. 10.1111/epi.13121 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neligan A, Noyce AJ, Gosavi TD, et al. . Change in mortality of generalized convulsive status epilepticus in high-income countries over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:897-905. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1268 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Legriel S, Mourvillier B, Bele N, et al. . Outcomes in 140 critically ill patients with status epilepticus. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:476–80. 10.1007/s00134-007-0915-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Legriel S, Azoulay E, Resche-Rigon M, et al. . Functional outcome after convulsive status epilepticus. Crit Care Med 2010;38:2295–303. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f859a6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alldredge BK, Gelb AM, Isaacs SM, et al. . A comparison of lorazepam, diazepam, and placebo for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus. N Engl J Med 2001;345:631–7. 10.1056/NEJMoa002141 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data