Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;61(2):1719-1733.
doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01509-5. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

The Importance of Spiritual Consumption, Religious Expression and Subjective Well-Being among Christians in the US during COVID-19

Osnat Roth-Cohen  1 , Sidharth Muralidharan  2 , Carrie La Ferle  3
Affiliations

The Importance of Spiritual Consumption, Religious Expression and Subjective Well-Being among Christians in the US during COVID-19

Osnat Roth-Cohen et al. J Relig Health. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Uncertainty, fear, and distress have become prevalent in the lives of U.S. residents since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The unpredictable reality of social distancing, shutdowns, and isolation have affected daily routines and influenced well-being and health. Drawing on consumer culture theory, we conducted an exploratory study to examine the mediating role of consumer spirituality in the subjective well-being of religious Christians during COVID-19 and to discover links between well-being and health outcomes. Participants from the United States (n = 104) were recruited via a Qualtrics' online panel. Findings show that religiosity among Christians enhanced subjective well-being, demonstrating the positive effect of religious beliefs, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, spiritual consumption mediated this relationship, suggesting the importance of possessions to religious expression and subjective well-being. Implications for messaging about health and well-being are discussed.

Keywords: COVID-19; Consumer spirituality; Health messaging; Religiosity; Subjective well-being; United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Hypothesized Model
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnould EJ, Thompson CJ. Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research. 2005;35(2):868–882. doi: 10.1086/591204. - DOI
    1. Batthyany A, Russo-Netzer P. Psychologies of meaning. In: Batthyany A, Russo-Netzer P, editors. Meaning in positive and existential psychology. Springer; 2014. pp. 3–22.
    1. Belk RW, Wallendorf M, Sherry JF. The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research. 1989;16(1):1–38. doi: 10.1086/209191. - DOI
    1. Belloc M, Francesco D, Galbiati R. Earthquakes, religion, and transition to self-government in Italian cities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2016;131(4):1875–1926. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjw020. - DOI
    1. Bentzen, J. S. (2020). In crisis, we pray: Religiosity and the COVID-19 pandemic. CEPR Discussion Paper Series, 52–108. Retrieved from In Crisis, We Pray: Religiosity and the COVID-19 Pandemic by Jeanet Bentzen : SSRN