Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;57(5):1253-1261.
doi: 10.1002/ppul.25859. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

A survey: Understanding the health and perspectives of people with CF not benefiting from CFTR modulators

Affiliations

A survey: Understanding the health and perspectives of people with CF not benefiting from CFTR modulators

Emily Kramer-Golinkoff et al. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: While the advent of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator use has improved daily life and long-term prognosis of CF for many with approved CFTR mutations, approximately 10% of people with CF (pwCF) have only symptomatic treatments available.

Methods: Between June 10 and July 1, 2021, Emily's Entourage distributed a 38-question anonymous survey targeted at pwCF not benefitting from approved modulators via social media and email to pwCF and CF advocacy groups in and outside the United States regarding health status, impact of CF, unmet needs, and clinical research interest.

Results: There were 431 survey respondents representing pwCF on five continents. The majority of pwCF had moderate lung disease (50.3%). Ineligibility based on CFTR mutation (64.1%) was the most frequently reported reason pwCF were not on modulators. PwCF reported the most impacted aspects of life were mental (66.7%) and physical (40.7%) health. Financial concerns and feelings of isolation were commonly reported. Witnessing improvements for peers with access to modulators was both uplifting and disheartening. The majority of pwCF would be interested in participating in future clinical research (77.6%), although some living outside of the United States cited lack of opportunity to participate in clinical trials as a barrier.

Conclusions: PwCF who are ineligible, intolerant, or lack access to modulators have a high burden of disease impacting their physical and mental health. Although most are happy for those who are benefiting from modulators, they are eager for the opportunity to experience similar improvements for themselves, and willing to participate in clinical trials of new therapies.

Keywords: 10%; CFTR modulator; cystic fibrosis; nonsense mutation; orphan disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Emily Kramer‐Golinkoff is a founding member of Emily's Entourage. In the past 3 years, her financial and commercial interests were with Medidata Solutions, Inc and Translate Bio, in terms of speaking at meetings/travel. Her noncommercial interests included consulting for the University of Pennsylvania Health System and speaking at meetings/travel from Cystic Fibrosis Research Incorporated, Personalized Medicine Coalition, Academy Health, and BIO International. Amanda Camacho was employed by Emily's Entourage at the time of the design and conduct of the survey as well as at the time of the writing of the original version of the manuscript. Liza Kramer had commercial interests (past 3 years) in terms of speaking at meetings/travel for Translate Bio, Cystic Fibrosis Research Incorporated, and Personalized Medicine Coalition. Jennifer L. Taylor‐Cousar, in the past 3 years, has displayed her financial and commercial interests as faculty for an institution that is part of the CF TDN. She had been site PI on studies for Vertex, Bayer, Celtaxys, Eloxx, Nivalis, and Proteostasis; on advisory boards for Genentech, Gilead, AbbVie, Insmed, and Vertex; done consulting/provided clinical trial design advice for Vertex, Celtaxys, Proteostasis, Santhera, 4DMT, and Polarean; and served on the data monitoring committee for AbbVie. She is a professional member of the CFF Clinical Research Executive Committee, CF TDN Women's Health Research Working Group, and ATS Clinical Problems Programming and Scientific Grant Review Committees. On a noncommercial basis, she had received a grant from the CFF. She also has nonprofit relationships with the CFF Board of Trustees and Emily's Entourage Scientific Advisory Board.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Respondents were asked to report CFTR mutation class and CFTR modulator eligibility. (A) Respondents self‐reported CFTR mutation class for each of their two mutations using this survey‐provided reference: Class 1: Protein production mutations—including nonsense mutations (i.e., G542X, W1282X, and R553X), some splice mutations and deletions; Class 2: Protein processing mutations—including F508del, N1303K, and I507del; Class 3: Gating mutations—including G551D and S549N; Class 4: Conduction mutations—including D1152H, R347P, and R117H; Class 5: Insufficient protein mutations—including some splice mutations (i.e., 3849+1‐ kb C‐‐>T); Other, please specify (free text; mutation 1 [n = 332], mutation 2 [n = 316]), *of the 44 respondents who reported their first or second mutations as “other,” based on data available in CFTR2, the majority of mutations were adjudicated as class I mutations (Table S1) (B) self‐reported eligibility and use of CFTR modulators (n = 334) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Respondents were asked to select all reasons that applied for their main rationale for participation in a CF clinical trial. N = 292. CF, cystic fibrosis [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Free text responses from respondents on living with CF and treatment options. CF, cystic fibrosis [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Castellani C, Duff AJA, Bell SC, et al. ECFS best practice guidelines: the 2018 revision. J Cyst Fibros. 2018;17(2):153‐178. - PubMed
    1. Bell SC, Mall MA, Gutierrez H, et al. The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(1):65‐124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramsey BW, Davies J, McElvaney NG, et al. A CFTR potentiator in patients with cystic fibrosis and the G551D mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(18):1663‐1672. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wainwright CE, Elborn JS, Ramsey BW. Lumacaftor‐ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis homozygous for Phe508del CFTR. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(18):1783‐1784. - PubMed
    1. Taylor‐Cousar JL, Munck A, McKone EF, et al. Tezacaftor‐ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis homozygous for Phe508del. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(21):2013‐2023. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances