Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data
- PMID: 35171029
- PMCID: PMC8849094
- DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01570-21
Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data
Abstract
The authors compared the clinical performance of DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) assay, which detects 14 high-risk HPVs with 16/18 genotyping based on hybrid capture technique, and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test for women undergoing cervical cancer screening. A total of 7, 263 residual cytology specimens from an adjudicated cohort with 3-year follow-up were tested by the DH3 assay and the HC2 test. Assay results were compared with each other and to histology review. The overall agreement between the DH3 assay and the HC2 test was 99.2% (κ = 0.938). At baseline, DH3 had the equal sensitivity to that of HC2 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher (CIN2+, n = 75) and CIN grade 3 or higher (CIN3+, n = 45), 98.67% and 97.78%, respectively. After 3 years of follow-up, the sensitivity for CIN2+ (n = 133) and CIN3+ (n = 74) were both similar between DH3 and HC2 (95.49% vs 94.74%, 95.95% vs 95.95%, respectively, all P > 0.05). The respective specificity for CIN2+ or CIN3+ did not differ between the two tests. A noninferiority test showed that both sensitivity and specificity of DH3 for CIN2+ and CIN3+ were noninferior to those of HC2 at baseline and after 3-year follow-up, respectively (all P < 0.001). When used in primary screening strategy, the DH3 assay would yield an immediate sensitivity of 92% for CIN2+. DH3 HPV performs equally to HC2 for the detection of high-grade lesions in cervical cancer screening and has a potential advantage in primary screening strategy due to HPV16/18 genotyping. IMPORTANCE The benefits of testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) in cervical cancer screening have already been demonstrated. Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) is the best validated HPV assay and has been considered the gold standard for hrHPV testing. However, HC2 cannot discriminate HPV16 and 18 from the other hrHPV types, which greatly limited the application of HC2 in cervical cancer screening. The DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) is a recently developed assay based on hybrid capture technique like to HC2, which can specifically identify HPV 16/18 on the basis of detecting the 13 hrHPV types targeted by HC2 as well as HPV66. This comparative study of the two assays for detection of hrHPV infection in residual cytology samples from cervical cancer screening setting reveals that DH3 HPV provides a perfect alternative to HC2 in detecting hrHPV infection and identifying cervical precancer, while allowing concurrent HPV 16/18 genotyping.
Keywords: DH3 HPV; Hybrid Capture 2; cervical cancer screening; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; human papillomavirus.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Risk stratification for cervical precancer and cancer by DH3-HPV partial genotyping and cytology in women attending cervical screening: A retrospective cohort study.J Med Virol. 2023 Feb;95(2):e28482. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28482. J Med Virol. 2023. PMID: 36609841
-
The performance of human papillomavirus DNA detection with type 16/18 genotyping by hybrid capture in primary test of cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in 10,669 Chinese women.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Dec;24(12):1322-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.027. Epub 2018 Mar 5. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018. PMID: 29518562
-
Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting.J Clin Virol. 2016 Mar;76 Suppl 1:S29-S39. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.11.021. Epub 2015 Nov 19. J Clin Virol. 2016. PMID: 26643051
-
Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer.Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095. Vaccine. 2012. PMID: 23199969 Review.
-
Accuracy and effectiveness of HPV mRNA testing in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jul;23(7):950-960. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00294-7. Epub 2022 Jun 13. Lancet Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35709810
Cited by
-
Which is the best management for women with normal cervical cytologic findings despite positivity for non-16/18 high risk human papillomaviruses?Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;10:950610. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.950610. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36438260 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Age-specific 3-year risk of cervical precancer among HPV-positive women attending screening: a post hoc analysis from a retrospective cohort.Infect Agent Cancer. 2024 Oct 16;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13027-024-00614-2. Infect Agent Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39415241 Free PMC article.
-
Role of NTRK Fusion Genes in the Tumor Immune Microenvironment of HPV (+/-) Cervical Cancer.J Med Virol. 2025 Aug;97(8):e70564. doi: 10.1002/jmv.70564. J Med Virol. 2025. PMID: 40832845 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Kyrgiou M, Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Bosch FX, Dillner J, Jit M, Kim J, Poljak M, Nieminen P, Sasieni P, Kesic V, Cuzick J, Gultekin M. 2020. Cervical screening: ESGO-EFC position paper of the European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO) and the European Federation of Colposcopy (EFC). Br J Cancer 123:510–517. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-0920-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed