Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 5;9(2):e35187.
doi: 10.2196/35187.

Patient Portal Messaging for Asynchronous Virtual Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis

Affiliations

Patient Portal Messaging for Asynchronous Virtual Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis

Ming Huang et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, patient portals and their message platforms allowed remote access to health care. Utilization patterns in patient messaging during the COVID-19 crisis have not been studied thoroughly. In this work, we propose characterizing patients and their use of asynchronous virtual care for COVID-19 via a retrospective analysis of patient portal messages.

Objective: This study aimed to perform a retrospective analysis of portal messages to probe asynchronous patient responses to the COVID-19 crisis.

Methods: We collected over 2 million patient-generated messages (PGMs) at Mayo Clinic during February 1 to August 31, 2020. We analyzed descriptive statistics on PGMs related to COVID-19 and incorporated patients' sociodemographic factors into the analysis. We analyzed the PGMs on COVID-19 in terms of COVID-19-related care (eg, COVID-19 symptom self-assessment and COVID-19 tests and results) and other health issues (eg, appointment cancellation, anxiety, and depression).

Results: The majority of PGMs on COVID-19 pertained to COVID-19 symptom self-assessment (42.50%) and COVID-19 tests and results (30.84%). The PGMs related to COVID-19 symptom self-assessment and COVID-19 test results had dynamic patterns and peaks similar to the newly confirmed cases in the United States and in Minnesota. The trend of PGMs related to COVID-19 care plans paralleled trends in newly hospitalized cases and deaths. After an initial peak in March, the PGMs on issues such as appointment cancellations and anxiety regarding COVID-19 displayed a declining trend. The majority of message senders were 30-64 years old, married, female, White, or urban residents. This majority was an even higher proportion among patients who sent portal messages on COVID-19.

Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients increased portal messaging utilization to address health care issues about COVID-19 (in particular, symptom self-assessment and tests and results). Trends in message usage closely followed national trends in new cases and hospitalizations. There is a wide disparity for minority and rural populations in the use of PGMs for addressing the COVID-19 crisis.

Keywords: COVID-19; asynchronous communication; digital health; health care; healthcare; pandemic; patient portal; patient portal message; remote healthcare; utilization; virtual care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Daily numbers and weekly smoothing averages (WSAs) of patient-generated messages (PGMs) related to COVID-19.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Daily numbers and weekly smoothing averages (WSAs) of patient-generated messages (PGMs) regarding COVID-19–related care (diagnosis and treatment): (A) COVID-19 symptom assessment via self-checker, (B) COVID-19 symptom assessment by providers via e-visits, (C) discussions regarding COVID-19 tests and results, and (D) care plans.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Daily numbers and weekly smoothing averages (WSAs) of patient-generated messages (PGMs) regarding COVID-19–related other health care issues: (A) general issues due to COVID-19, (B) postponement, (C) cancellation, (D) anxiety, (E) depression, and (F) suicidal ideation.

References

    1. Budd J, Miller BS, Manning EM, Lampos V, Zhuang M, Edelstein M, Rees G, Emery VC, Stevens MM, Keegan N, Short MJ, Pillay D, Manley E, Cox IJ, Heymann D, Johnson AM, McKendry RA. Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1183–1192. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1011-4.10.1038/s41591-020-1011-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, Gellad Z, Cho A, Phinney D, Curtis S, Roman M, Poon EG, Ferranti J, Katz JN, Tcheng J. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 01;27(6):957–962. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32311034 5822868 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson J, Jacobs J, Yefimova M, Greene L, Heyworth L, Zulman D. Virtual care expansion in the Veterans Health Administration during the COVID-19 pandemic: clinical services and patient characteristics associated with utilization. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 01;28(3):453–462. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa284. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/33125032 5943879 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Irizarry T, DeVito Dabbs A, Curran CR. Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255. https://www.jmir.org/2015/6/e148/ v17i6e148 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kruse CS, Bolton K, Freriks G. The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 10;17(2):e44. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3171. https://www.jmir.org/2015/2/e44/ v17i2e44 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources