Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 1;30(9):416-420.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00466. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

Relative Value Units Underestimate Reimbursement for Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty

Elshaday S Belay  1 , Lefko T Charalambous, Eliana B Saltzman, Christopher S Klifto, Oke Anakwenze
Affiliations

Relative Value Units Underestimate Reimbursement for Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty

Elshaday S Belay et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Relative value units (RVUs) have been fundamental to reimbursement calculations in payment models for arthroplasty surgeons. RVUs are based on various factors, including physician work, and have been higher for increased complexity, such as revision arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare RVUs and estimated reimbursement differences between primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to collect primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty cases in 2017. Data variables collected included age at the time of surgery, surgical time, and RVU for each shoulder arthroplasty.

Results: A total of 4,948 shoulder arthroplasty patients (4,657 primary and 291 revision) were included in this study. The mean age was 69.1 years (9.6 SD) for primary shoulder arthroplasty and 67.8 years (10.4 SD) for revision shoulder arthroplasty, P = 0.02. RVU for primary shoulder arthroplasty was 22.1 (0 SD) compared with 26.4 (1.1 SD) for revision shoulder arthroplasty (P = 0.0001). Surgical time was significantly higher in revision versus primary cases, 131.5 minutes (89.0 SD) versus 109.3 minutes (42.5 SD) (P = 0.0001). RVUs per minute were near equivalent for primary and revision arthroplasty at 0.20 (0.1 SD) and 0.20 (01 SD), respectively. However, owing to the difference in surgical time and cases per day, this translates to an estimated reimbursement difference of $174,554.4 per year more for primary shoulder arthroplasty over revision cases.

Conclusion: The current RVU model does not adequately factor surgical time for revision shoulder arthroplasty and translates to a notable yearly reimbursement difference that favors primary shoulder arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stecker EC, Schroeder SA: Adding value to relative-value units. N Engl J Med 2013;369:2176-2179.
    1. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative: General Information. Baltimore, MD, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2019.
    1. Johnson SE, Newton WP: Resource-based relative value units: A primer for academic family physicians. Fam Med 2002;34:172-176.
    1. Nurok M, Gewertz B: Relative value units and the measurement of physician performance. JAMA 2019;322:1139-1140.
    1. Alaskan Labor Department. Introduction to Relative Value Units and How Medicare Reimbursement Is Calculated. https://labor.alaska.gov/wc/med-serv-comm/CMS_RVU_Calculations.pdf .

LinkOut - more resources