Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov 21;77(11):2177-2180.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac042.

Is Sex as a Biological Variable Still Being Ignored in Preclinical Aging Research?

Affiliations
Review

Is Sex as a Biological Variable Still Being Ignored in Preclinical Aging Research?

Colleen Carmody et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Five years ago, the National Institute of Health (NIH) introduced a mandate to revolutionize the way sex as a biological variable (SABV) is considered in NIH-funded preclinical research. Given the known effects of sex on aging physiology, pathology, treatment response, and the effectiveness of interventions it is particularly important that SABV be considered in basic biology of aging research. Five years after this mandate, a significant amount of published work funded by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) is still not including mice of both sexes and/or not considering sex differences or comparisons in preclinical studies. Here we review a cross-section of recently published NIA-funded research to determine adherence to this mandate. We discuss the state of the preclinical aging field in terms of SABV and suggest strategies for improving adherence to the NIH mandate. It is imperative that we consider SABV and include males and females in all aspects of aging biology research to improve health outcomes for all.

Keywords: Aging research; Female; Male; Preclinical; Sex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Results of an informal review of NIA-funded research in mice published from 2020 to 2021 and whether sex as a biological variable was considered. Five hundred and nine research articles were included from PubMed that reported NIH extramural research support, were published between January 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021, and included the search terms “NIA” and “mice”. (A) A pie graph indicating whether studies included male, female, both, or did not specify the sex of mice, and (B) of those that included both sexes, was data compared by sex. NIA = National Institute on Aging; NIH = National Institute of Health.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Results of an informal review of NIA-funded research in mice published in subject specific journals dedicated to the biology of aging (Aging, Aging Cell, Experimental Gerontology, Geroscience, Journals of Gerontology Series A, and Neurobiology of Aging), from 2020 to 2021 and whether sex as a biological variable was considered. (A) A pie graph indicating whether studies included male, female, both, or did not specify the sex of mice, and (B) of those that included both sexes, was data compared by sex. NIA = National Institute on Aging.

References

    1. Miller LR, Marks C, Becker JB, et al. . Considering sex as a biological variable in preclinical research. FASEB J. 2017;31:29–34. doi:10.1096/fj.201600781R - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robinet P, Milewicz DM, Cassis LA, Leeper NJ, Lu HS, Smith JD. Consideration of sex differences in design and reporting of experimental arterial pathology studies-statement from ATVB council. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018;38:292–303. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309524 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnegard ME, Whitten LA, Hunter C, Clayton JA. Sex as a biological variable: a 5-year progress report and call to action. J Women Health (2002). 2020;29:858–864. doi:10.1089/jwh.2019.8247 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nature. Accounting for sex and gender makes for better science. Nature. 2020;588:196. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03459-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Commission E. How inclusive analysis contributes to research and innovation: policy review 2020. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/33b4c99f-2e66-1... The DOI is: 10.2777/316197

Publication types