Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr;247(7):561-566.
doi: 10.1177/15353702221078216. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

Ethical and regulatory oversight of clinical research: The role of the Institutional Review Board

Lindsay McNair  1
Affiliations
Review

Ethical and regulatory oversight of clinical research: The role of the Institutional Review Board

Lindsay McNair. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2022 Apr.

Abstract

The history of clinical research is, unfortunately, filled with examples of research studies that took advantage of and harmed research participants, to fulfill the research goals of scientists. Over time, we have created a system of ethical codes, principles, and regulations that are designed to prevent these abuses and to ensure that the rights and welfare of research participants are protected and honored. This review article will provide a brief history of clinical research ethics and ethical codes, outlining how those codes developed into the current regulatory requirements for the ethical oversight of clinical research. Understanding the current human subject protection systems will allow researchers to use best practices for planning and conducting rigorous, scientifically valid and ethical clinical studies. Understanding the history, principles, and foundations of the development of this system will equip researchers to understand what resources are available to them and how to make the best decisions when confronted with unique ethical situations in the conduct of their research.

Keywords: Bioethics; Institutional Review Board; clinical trials; ethical review; human research subjects; informed consent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med 1966;274:1354–60 - PubMed
    1. Robinson WM, Unruh BT. The hepatitis experiments at the Willowbrook State School. In: Emanuel EJ, Grady C, Crouch RA, Lie RK, Miller FG, Wendler D. (eds) The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp.80–5
    1. Arras JD. The Jewish chronic disease hospital case. In: Emanuel EJ, Grady C, Crouch RA, Lie RK, Miller FG, Wendler D. (eds) The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp.73–9
    1. Herrera CD. Ethics, deception, and “those Milgram experiments.” J Appl Philos 2001;18:245–56 - PubMed
    1. White RM. Unraveling the Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:585–98 - PubMed