Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):e048933.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048933.

Changes in youth care use after the implementation of community-based support teams: repeated measurement study using registry data and data on team characteristics

Cathelijne L Mieloo  1 , Jan van der Ende  2 , Alissa Lysanne van Zijl  3 , Merel Schuring  4 , Bram Steijn  3 , Wilma Jansen  5   6
Affiliations

Changes in youth care use after the implementation of community-based support teams: repeated measurement study using registry data and data on team characteristics

Cathelijne L Mieloo et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: New legislation on youth care in the Netherlands led to the implementation of community-based support teams, providing integrated primary youth care. Important aims of the new Youth Act were more integrated, timely care and less use of intensive forms of care. Our aim was to study changes in youth care use in time and the role of newly introduced community-based support teams herein.

Setting: Register data (2015-2018) on youth of a large city were linked and combined with administrative and aggregated data on team characteristics.

Participants: Data on 126 095 youth (0-18 years) were available for analyses.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary, specialised and residential youth care use were the primary outcomes.

Results: Generalised estimating equations analyses adjusted for individual characteristics demonstrated that over 4 years, use of primary youth care increased from 2.2% to 8.5% (OR 1.70; 99% CI 1.67 to 1.73), specialised youth care decreased from 7.2% to 6.4% (OR 0.98; 99% CI 0.97 to 1.00) and residential youth care increased slightly (OR 1.04; 99% CI 1.01 to 1.06). Gender, age, family status, migrant background and educational level were all associated with the types of youth care use and also with some trends in time. Likelihood to receive care increased in time for preschool and younger children but did not improve for migrant children.Case load, team size, team turnover, team performance and transformational leadership showed significant associations with different types of youth care use but hardly with trends in time.

Conclusion: Patterns of youth care use changed towards more locally provided primary youth care, slightly less specialised and slightly more residential youth care. Furthermore, youth care use among younger children increased in time. These trends are partly in line with the trends intended by the Youth Act. Little evidence was found for the role of specific team characteristics on changes in youth care use in time.

Keywords: child & adolescent psychiatry; mental health; organisation of health services; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of youth care use across years.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lempinen L, Luntamo T, Sourander A. Changes in mental health service use among 8-year-old children: a 24-year time-trend study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019;28:521–30. 10.1007/s00787-018-1218-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sturm R, Andreyeva T. Use of mental health care among Youths in 1997 and 2002. Psychiatr Serv 2005;56:793. 10.1176/appi.ps.56.7.793 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paltser G, Martin-Rhee M, Cheng C, et al. . CIHI survey: care for children and youth with mental disorders in Canada. Healthc Q 2016;19:10–12. 10.12927/hcq.2016.24616 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olfson M, Druss BG, Marcus SC. Trends in mental health care among children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2029–38. 10.1056/NEJMsa1413512 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Yperen T, Van De Maat A, Prakken J. The Growing Use of Youthcare; Interpretation and Strategy. [Het groeiend jeugdzorggebruik; Duiding en aanpak. Netherlands Youth Institute: Utrecht, 2020.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources