Effect of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis on recurrence, menstruation and pregnancy outcomes in patients with different degrees of intrauterine adhesions
- PMID: 35173868
- PMCID: PMC8829641
Effect of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis on recurrence, menstruation and pregnancy outcomes in patients with different degrees of intrauterine adhesions
Abstract
Objective: To study the recurrence, menstruation, and pregnancy outcome in patients with different degrees of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.
Methods: From February 2017 to January 2020, 300 patients with intrauterine adhesions were recruited in this study. Patients were divided into group A (mild), group B (moderate) and Group C (severe). All patients underwent hysteroscopic adhesion separation. The uterine cavity was re-examined by hysteroscopy 3 months after surgery to evaluate the uterine cavity morphology, the degree and treatment effect of the intrauterine adhesions, menstrual volume, and pregnancy outcomes after 2 years.
Results: Compared to group A, the reconstruction rates of group B and C were lower, and group B was significantly higher than group C. The re-adhesion rate of group C was significantly higher than that of group A and group B, but no significant differences were observed between group A and group B. Furthermore, the efficacy of surgical treatment was evaluated. The treatment effect of group B and group C was not as obvious as that of group A, and group C was worse. The degree of intrauterine adhesions was negatively correlated with pregnancy rate and live birth rate of the fetus. Before treatment, there were significant differences in endometrial vascular index (EVI), blood flow Index (FI), endometrial volume (EV), and vascular blood flow index (VFI) among the three groups of patients with different degrees of adhesion. As the degree of adhesion increased before treatment, blood flow decreased. Surgery significantly improved the clinical symptoms of the three groups of patients. Moreover, the recovery of patients in group A was the best, followed by group B, and group C had the worst recovery.
Conclusion: The treatment effect and prognosis of patients were related to the degree of intrauterine adhesions before treatment. As the degree of intrauterine adhesions increased, the treatment effect and prognosis of patients became worse, and intensive treatment was needed. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, trial number ChiCTR1700026770, trial URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/).
Keywords: Hysteroscopic adhesions separation; different degrees; intrauterine adhesions; menstruation; pregnancy outcome; recurrence.
AJTR Copyright © 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of three methods to prevent re-adhesion after hysteroscopic intrauterine adhesion separation: a parallel, randomized and single-center trial.Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jun;10(6):6804-6823. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1296. Ann Palliat Med. 2021. PMID: 34237979 Clinical Trial.
-
Optimal timing of hysteroscopic follow-up to prevent the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions: a retrospective study.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025 Dec;45(1):2500970. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2025.2500970. Epub 2025 Jun 2. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025. PMID: 40455065
-
Comparing the efficacy and pregnancy outcome of intrauterine balloon and intrauterine contraceptive device in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in infertile women: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial study.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Apr 23;22(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01222-w. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024. PMID: 38654308 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of the use of amniotic membrane to prevent recurrence of intrauterine adhesion after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Nov;143(2):145-149. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12635. Epub 2018 Aug 29. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018. PMID: 30073656 Review.
-
Meta-analysis on the use of hyaluronic acid gel to prevent recurrence of intrauterine adhesion after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;58(6):731-736. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.09.002. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31759520 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of focused ultrasound ablation and myomectomy on pelvic adhesions in patients with uterine fibroids.Am J Transl Res. 2023 Dec 15;15(12):6959-6969. eCollection 2023. Am J Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 38187000 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of pharmacokinetics and safety of a long-term estradiol-releasing stent in rat uterine.Regen Ther. 2022 Oct 21;21:494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2022.10.001. eCollection 2022 Dec. Regen Ther. 2022. PMID: 36313395 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation versus hysteroscopic cold knife separation alone in the treatment of infertility or amenorrhea caused by severe intrauterine adhesion: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Surg. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02964-z. BMC Surg. 2025. PMID: 40474175 Free PMC article.
-
Primer on Female Infertility for the Reproductive Urologist.Urol Res Pract. 2023 Nov;49(6):338-344. doi: 10.5152/tud.2023.23167. Urol Res Pract. 2023. PMID: 37971387 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Yang JH, Chen CD, Chen SU, Yang YS, Chen MJ. The influence of the location and extent of intrauterine adhesions on recurrence after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. BJOG. 2016;123:618–623. - PubMed
-
- Li X, Wu L, Zhou Y, Fan X, Huang J, Wu J, Yu R, Lou J, Yang M, Yao Z, Xue M. New crosslinked hyaluronan gel for the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after dilation and curettage in patients with delayed miscarriage: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26:94–99. - PubMed
-
- Deans R, Abbott J. Review of intrauterine adhesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:555–569. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials