Effect of simulated brushing on surface roughness and wear of bis-acryl-based materials submitted to different polishing protocols

Abstract

Background: Provisional materials must have enough strength to withstand masticatory loads without suffering deformation or fracture, and their surfaces must have good finishing and polishing characteristics to reduce biofilm accumulation. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the best polishing protocol for different bis-acryl composite resins in comparison with a conventional resin composite and a self-curing acrylic resin aiming to obtain a smooth restoration surface and resistance to wear.

Material and methods: One hundred and four samples (15 mm length x 5 mm width x 4 mm depth) were prepared and divided into four groups according to the material tested: Protemp 4 and Structur 3 bis-acryl composite resins, Dencor self-curing acrylic resin, Filtek Z350XT conventional composite resin. The polishing procedures were performed with Sof-Lex Pop-On discs or Sof-Lex spirals and abrasion procedures were performed on a brushing machine. The surface roughness was analyzed at three periods (initial, post-polishing and post-brushing) and the wear was evaluated after simulated brushing. The results were submitted to ANOVA followed by the Tukey (α = 0.05).

Results: Filtek Z350XT groups showed the lowest values of initial surface roughness followed by Structur 3, Protemp 4 and Dencor groups. After polishing and simulated brushing, Filtek Z350XT groups also presented the lowest roughness values, followed by bis-acryl groups (Structur 3 and Protemp 4) and Dencor groups demonstrated the highest surface roughness. Sof-Lex Pop-On discs system exhibited lower roughness values for all groups.

Conclusions: Sof-Lex Pop-On discs system promoted the best polishing for all groups. Overall, Filtek Z350XT groups presented lower results for both roughness and wear for all periods evaluated, followed by Protemp 4 and Structur 3, meanwhile Dencor groups presented the highest roughness and wear values for all periods. Key words:Acrylic resin, bis-acryl, brushing, composite resin, polishing, roughness, wear.

Figure 1

Protemp 4: A) Initial surface roughness (SLD); B) After polishing (SLD); C) After brushing (SLD); D) Initial surface roughness (SLS); E) After polishing (SLS); F) After brushing (SLS).

Figure 2

Structur 3: A) Initial surface roughness (SLD); B) After polishing (SLD); C) After brushing (SLD); D) Initial surface roughness (SLS); E) After polishing (SLS); F) After brushing (SLS).

Figure 3

Dencor: A) Initial surface roughness (SLD); B) After polishing (SLD); C) After brushing (SLD); D) Initial surface roughness (SLS); E) After polishing (SLS); F) After brushing (SLS).

Figure 4

Z350XT: A) Initial surface roughness (SLD); B) After polishing (SLD); C) After brushing (SLD); D) Initial surface roughness (SLS); E) After polishing (SLS); F) After brushing (SLS).