Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun;11(2):241-252.
doi: 10.1007/s13668-022-00397-1. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

Recent Developments in the Assessment of Nutrition Knowledge in Athletes

Ryan Tam  1   2 , Janelle A Gifford  3 , Kathryn L Beck  4
Affiliations
Review

Recent Developments in the Assessment of Nutrition Knowledge in Athletes

Ryan Tam et al. Curr Nutr Rep. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Adequate nutrition knowledge may influence dietary behaviour, and the performance and health of athletes. Assessment of the nutrition knowledge of athletes can inform practice and provide a quantitative way to evaluate education interventions. This article aims to review nutrition knowledge questionnaires published in the last 5 years to identify advances, possible improvements in questionnaire development and design, and challenges that remain.

Recent findings: Twelve new or modified questionnaires were identified. All had undergone validity and reliability testing. Advancements included quantitative measures of content validity and Rasch analysis. Online questionnaires were common, with at least seven using this format. Advances included use of images (n = 2), automated scored feedback (n = 1), and use of applied questions. While advancements have been made in validation and reliability testing and electronic delivery, new questionnaires would benefit from interactive and attractive features including images, provision of electronic feedback, and applied questions.

Keywords: Athlete knowledge; Knowledge questionnaire; Nutrition knowledge; Questionnaire development; Reliability; Sports nutrition; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: nutrition and athletic performance. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(3):501–528. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.12.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maughan R. The athlete’s diet: nutritional goals and dietary strategies. Proc Nutr Soc. 2002;61(1):87–96. doi: 10.1079/PNS2001132. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hottenrott K, Hass E, Kraus M, Neumann G, Steiner M, Knechtle B. A scientific nutrition strategy improves time trial performance by≈ 6% when compared with a self-chosen nutrition strategy in trained cyclists: a randomized cross-over study. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37(4):637–645. doi: 10.1139/h2012-028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hansen EA, Emanuelsen A, Gertsen RM, Sørensen SSR. Improved marathon performance by in-race nutritional strategy intervention. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2014;24(6):645–655. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Birkenhead KL, Slater G. A review of factors influencing athletes’ food choices. Sports Med. 2015;45(11):1511–1522. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0372-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources