Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jun;94(6):2317-2330.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.27652. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

The importance of fecal nucleic acid detection in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The importance of fecal nucleic acid detection in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jin-Qiu Zhou et al. J Med Virol. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Pooled data from 2352 hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with viral RNA in feces across 46 studies were analyzed and the pooled prevalence of fecal RNA was 46.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.383-0.554). The pooled analysis showed that the occurrence of total gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms was 28.5% (95% CI: 0.125-0.44) in COVID-19 patients with fecal RNA, that of both respiratory and GI symptoms was 21.9% (95% CI: 0.09-0.346), that of only GI symptoms was 19.8% (95% CI: 0.107-0.288), and that of only respiratory symptoms was 50.5%(95% CI: 0.267-0.744). The pooled data showed no significant difference in positive fecal RNA between severe and nonsevere cases (odds ratio = 2.009, p = 0.079, 95% CI: 0.922-4.378). During hospital admission, after samples from the respiratory system tested negative for viral RNA, 55.4% (95% CI: 0.418-0.669) of the patients with positive fecal RNA had persistent shedding of fecal RNA and pooled results from the other 4 studies including 848 discharged patients with nucleic acid-negative stool samples indicated that the occurrence of repositive stool swabs was 18.1% (95% CI: 0.028-0.335), that of repositive respiratory swabs was 22.8% (95% CI: 0.003-0.452), that of both repositive stool and respiratory swabs was 19.1% (95% CI: 0.019-0.363), and that of only repositive stool swabs was 9.6% (95% CI: 0.010-0.203). The digestive tract may be an important organ involved in COVID-19 infection and in the excretion of the virus. Because of the potential risk of fecal-oral transmission, giving emphasis on stool swab tests can help increase the detection rate of asymptomatic carriers and reduce missed diagnoses.

Keywords: COVID-19; fecal; meta-analysis; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The workflow of the selection process in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) patients with the date of virus RNA in stool
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pooled prevalence of detectable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) RNA in fecal samples of patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trial sequential analysis for the nucleic acid‐positive stool of patients with diarrhea compared with those without diarrhea

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mao R, Qiu Y, He JS, et al. Manifestations and prognosis of gastrointestinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID‐19: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(7):667‐678. Gastrointestinal symptoms & stool viral RNA positivity rate in COVID‐19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar VCS, Mukherjee S, Harne PS, et al. Novelty in the gut: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID‐19. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020;7(1):e000417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hayashi Y, Wagatsuma K, Nojima M, et al. The characteristics of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with severe COVID‐19: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2021;56(5):409‐420. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xiao F, Tang M, Zheng X, Liu Y, Li X, Shan H. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS‐CoV‐2. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(6):1831‐1833. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang WL, Xu Y, Gao, R , et al. Detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1843‐1844. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types