Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 1;35(2):240-248.
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001041.

Novel approaches to measuring neurocognitive functions in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials

Affiliations
Review

Novel approaches to measuring neurocognitive functions in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials

Scott Carlson et al. Curr Opin Neurol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: We comprehensively examined recent advancements in developing novel cognitive measures that could significantly enhance detection of outcome changes in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials. Previously established measures were largely limited in their ability to detect subtle cognitive declines in preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease, particularly due to weak psychometric properties (including practice effects and ceiling effects) and requirement of in-person visits that impacted ascertainment.

Recent findings: We present novel cognitive measures that were designed to exhibit reduced practice effects and stronger correlations with Alzheimer's disease biomarkers. In addition, we summarized some recent efforts in developing remote testing measures protocols that are aimed to overcome the limitations and inconvenience of in-person testing, and digital phenotyping, which analyses subtle forms of digital behaviour indicative of cognitive phenotypes. We discuss each measure's prognostic accuracy and potential utility in Alzheimer's disease research while also commenting on their limitations. We also describe our study, the Development of Novel Measures for Alzheimer's Disease Prevention Trials (NoMAD), that employed a parallel group design in which novel measures and established measures are compared in a clinical trials armature.

Summary: Overall, we believe that these recent developments offer promising improvements in accurately detecting clinical and preclinical cognitive changes in the Alzheimer's disease spectrum; however, further validation of their psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracies is warranted before reliably implementing these novel measures in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1A.
Fig 1A.
Study Design. Participants are randomized into the novel or established group. The novel group completes the NPE battery and the CFAS at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. The established group completes the PACC, ADAS-cog, and FAQ at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Both groups undergo MRI and have plasma biomarkers drawn at baseline and 12 months.
Fig. 1B.
Fig. 1B.
Miami Computerized Functional Assessment Scale (CFAS). Participants complete computerized simulations of four everyday activities: using an ATM machine, using an online banking system, operating a ticket kiosk, and managing medications.

References

    1. 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2020. - PubMed
    1. Jack CR Jr., Holtzman DM: Biomarker modeling of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 2013, 80:1347–1358. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldberg TE, Goldman RS, Burdick KE, Malhotra AK, Lencz T, Patel RC, Woerner MG, Schooler NR, Kane JM, Robinson DG: Cognitive improvement after treatment with second-generation antipsychotic medications in first-episode schizophrenia: is it a practice effect? Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007, 64:1115–1122. - PubMed
    1. Goldberg TE, Harvey PD, Wesnes KA, Snyder PJ, Schneider LS: Practice effects due to serial cognitive assessment: Implications for preclinical Alzheimer’s disease randomized controlled trials. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2015, 1:103–111. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calamia M, Markon K, Tranel D: Scoring higher the second time around: meta-analyses of practice effects in neuropsychological assessment. Clin Neuropsychol 2012, 26:543–570. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources