Performance Evaluation of the i-SmartCare 10 Analyzer and Method Comparison of Six Point-of-Care Blood Gas Analyzers
- PMID: 35177567
- PMCID: PMC8859550
- DOI: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.467
Performance Evaluation of the i-SmartCare 10 Analyzer and Method Comparison of Six Point-of-Care Blood Gas Analyzers
Abstract
Blood gas, electrolyte, glucose, and lactate level measurement have an immediate and critical impact on patient care. We evaluated the performance of i-SmartCare 10 (i-SENS Inc., Seoul, Korea) and conducted a method comparison study of five point-of-care (POC) analyzers with i-SmartCare 10 as the comparator, according to the CLSI guidelines. Ten analytes (pH, pCO2, pO2, Na+, K+, Cl-, iCa2+, glucose, lactate, and Hct) were tested on six analyzers: i-SmartCare 10, ABL90 FLEX PLUS (Radiometer Medical ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark), i-Stat (Abbott Point of Care Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA), RapidLab 1265 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA), Stat Profile pHOx Ultra (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA), and Gem Premier 5000 (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA). The total imprecision and linearity (r2>0.99) were excellent, except for a few analytes that narrowly escaped the preset criteria. Interference was noted for Na+ in the presence of a high K+ level and for iCa2+ in the presence of high K+ and Mg2+ levels. Forty of 48 items demonstrated either a proportional or systematic difference in regression analysis; the relative mean difference (%) of 14/48 items escaped the allowable total error in the difference plot analysis. i-SmartCare 10 shows acceptable performance, and using a single POC blood gas analyzer is recommended for monitoring.
Keywords: Analytical performance evaluation; Blood gas analyzer; Method comparison; Point-of-care; i-SmartCare 10.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Analytical and pre-analytical performance characteristics of a novel cartridge-type blood gas analyzer for point-of-care and laboratory testing.Clin Biochem. 2018 Mar;53:116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Jan 12. Clin Biochem. 2018. PMID: 29339078
-
Comparison of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with two different blood gas analyzers and a core laboratory analyzer.Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015 Apr;75(2):97-105. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.981854. Epub 2014 Nov 28. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015. PMID: 25431133
-
A Comparative Assessment of the Nova Stat Profile Prime Plus® Critical Care Analyzer.Cureus. 2020 Aug 21;12(8):e9932. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9932. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 32968593 Free PMC article.
-
Compatibility levels between blood gas analysis and central laboratory hemoglobin and electrolyte tests in pediatric patients: A single-center experience.Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Feb;33(2):107-113. doi: 10.1111/pan.14567. Epub 2022 Oct 10. Paediatr Anaesth. 2023. PMID: 36178754 Review.
-
Point-of-care blood gas and electrolyte analysis in rabbits.Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2013 Jan;16(1):175-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Dec 12. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2013. PMID: 23347543 Review.
Cited by
-
A passive blood separation sensing platform for point-of-care devices.NPJ Biosens. 2025;2(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s44328-025-00038-x. Epub 2025 May 2. NPJ Biosens. 2025. PMID: 40322246 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical performance validation of an integrated cartridge based bedside blood gas analyzer system in the acute care setting.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06710-6. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40594851 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous