Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 1:12:796464.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796464. eCollection 2021.

Goats (Capra hircus) From Different Selection Lines Differ in Their Behavioural Flexibility

Affiliations

Goats (Capra hircus) From Different Selection Lines Differ in Their Behavioural Flexibility

Christian Nawroth et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Given that domestication provided animals with more stable environmental conditions, artificial selection by humans has likely affected animals' ability to learn novel contingencies and their ability to adapt to changing environments. In addition, the selection for specific traits in domestic animals might have an additional impact on subjects' behavioural flexibility, but also their general learning performance, due to a re-allocation of resources towards parameters of productivity. To test whether animals bred for high productivity would experience a shift towards lower learning performance, we compared the performance of dwarf goats (not selected for production, 15 subjects) and dairy goats (selected for high milk yield, 18 subjects) in a visual discrimination learning and reversal learning task. Goats were tested individually in a test compartment and were rewarded by choosing either a white or a black cup presented by the experimenter on a sliding board behind a crate. Once they reached a designated learning criterion in the initial learning task, they were transferred to the reversal learning task. To increase the heterogeneity of our test sample, data was collected by two experimenters at two research stations following a similar protocol. Goats of both selection lines did not differ in the initial discrimination learning task in contrast to the subsequent reversal learning task. Dairy goats reached the learning criterion slower compared to dwarf goats (dairy goats = 9.18 sessions; dwarf goats = 7.74 sessions; P = 0.016). Our results may indicate that the selection for milk production might have affected behavioural flexibility in goats. These differences in adapting to changing environmental stimuli might have an impact on animal welfare e.g., when subjects have to adapt to new environments or changes in housing and management routines.

Keywords: animal cognition; discrimination learning; farm animals; reversal learning; ungulates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example illustration of the test setup during the visual discrimination and reversal learning task. © Nordlicht/FBN.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Violin plots with jittered raw data points (grey dots) showing the performance of dwarf and dairy goats in the initial visual discrimination learning task (left) and the reversal learning task (right). Figure shows also model estimates (black dots) and 95% CIs (error bar).

References

    1. Akinsoyinu A. O., Mba A. U., Olubajo F. O. (1977). Studies on milk yield and composition of the West African dwarf goat in Nigeria. J. Dairy Res. 44, 57–62. 10.1017/S0022029900019920 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amici F., Aureli F., Call J. (2008). Fission-fusion dynamics, behavioral flexibility, and inhibitory control in primates. Curr. Biol. CB 18, 1415–1419. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amici F., Call J., Aureli F. (2009). Variation in withholding of information in three monkey species. Proc. Biol. Sci. Royal Soc. 276, 3311–3318. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0759 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour . (2020). Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim. Behav. 159, 1–11. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.11.002 - DOI
    1. Beilharz R. G., Luxford B. G., Wilkinson J. L. (1993). Quantitative genetics and evolution: is our understanding of genetics sufficient to explain evolution? J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 110, 161–170. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.1993.tb00728.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources