Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;24(2):119-130.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01631-y. Epub 2022 Feb 18.

Heart Transplant Donor Selection Guidelines: Review and Recommendations

Affiliations
Review

Heart Transplant Donor Selection Guidelines: Review and Recommendations

Shyama Sathianathan et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The rate of heart transplants, while steadily increasing, is insufficient to meet the growing list of transplant candidates. Marginal donors expand the donor pool. However, criteria used to identify donors greatly vary by institution.

Recent findings: The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) heart transplant report of 2020 reinforced the importance of donor selection criteria on heart transplant outcomes. Existing literature challenges and reinforces the report's findings. Newer methods, such as donation after circulatory death (DCD), also recontextualize existing donor selection criteria. Transplant prediction models from international databases are poor predictors of individual centers' outcome. Further study is needed to understand associations among donor risk factors, and update the methods used for donor heart selection. In this review, we examine the current literature on extended donor criteria and recommend a model for donor selection.

Keywords: Donation after circulatory death; Donor acceptance; Donor selection; Extended criteria cardiac transplant; Heart transplant; Marginal donors.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:
• Of importance
•• Of major importance
    1. ••Khush KK, Potena L, Cherikh WS, Chambers DC, Harhay MO, Hayes Jr D, et al. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: 37th adult heart transplantation report-2020; focus on deceased donor characteristics. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;39(10):1003–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2020.07.010 . Most recent ISHLT report documenting the international implications of extended donor criteria and guidelines for donor selection.
    1. Jasseron C, Legeai C, Jacquelinet C, Nubret-Le Coniat K, Flécher E, Cantrelle C, et al. Optimization of heart allocation: the transplant risk score. Am J Transplant. 2019;19(5):1507–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15201 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fudim M, Davis ME, Jenkins C, Brown CL, Wigger MA, Stulak JM, et al. Marginal donor use in patients undergoing heart transplantation with left ventricular assist device explantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(6):2117–25. - DOI
    1. Del Rizzo DF, Menkis AH, Pflugfelder PW, Novick RJ, McKenzie FN, Boyd WD, et al. The role of donor age and ischemic time on survival following orthotopic heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999;18(4):310–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-2498(98)00059-x . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Samsky MD, Patel CB, Owen A, Schulte PJ, Jentzer J, Rosenberg PB, et al. Ten-year experience with extended criteria cardiac transplantation. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(6):1230–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000296 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources