Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 15:141:290-299.
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.036. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Waste recycling policies and Covid-19 pandemic in an E-DSGE model

Amedeo Argentiero  1 , Alessio D'Amato  2 , Mariangela Zoli  3
Affiliations

Waste recycling policies and Covid-19 pandemic in an E-DSGE model

Amedeo Argentiero et al. Waste Manag. .

Abstract

Among the environmental problems of the 21st century, waste production and management are particularly pressing. Despite policy efforts, waste volumes are still increasing worldwide and landfilling remains the main disposal option in several parts of the world. Together with the huge environmental impacts of the large amounts of waste landfilled, it would be possible to save enormous amounts of resources improving reuse and recycle options. The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak has been significant also in the waste cycle, leading to an increase in the amount of non-recyclable consumption in response to sanitary needs, as well as to new consumption practices. On the basis of these considerations this paper aims at analysing: (i) the short run impact on output, consumption and health of appropriate waste policies aimed at reducing non-recyclable waste production, and (ii) to highlight the mechanics triggered by an exogenous pandemic event in terms of waste management, environmental and health impacts. To these ends, we adopt an E-DSGE approach. Our results confirm the relevance of policies and consumers' preferences in driving waste management towards a circular economy transition. More importantly, our (to our knowledge) novel analysis suggests the existence of a trade-off between environmental quality and health in the presence of a pandemic event, suggesting the need to increase preparedness to such events, in order to avoid relying on "emergency approaches", based on resorting to increases in non-recyclable consumption types (e.g. single use plastics).

Keywords: Circular economy; Covid-19 pandemic; Recycling; Subsidies; Waste.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The model structure.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Waste policy shock - Impulse Response Functions (upper part) - Aggregate impacts (lower part).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Taste shock - Impulse Response Functions (upper part) - Aggregate impacts (lower part).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pandemic shock - Impulse Response Functions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Acemoglu D., Aghion P., Bursztyn L., Hemous D. The environment and directed technical change. Am. Econ. Rev. 2012;102(1):131–166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adyel T.M. Accumulation of plastic waste during COVID-19. Science. 2020;369(6509):1314–1315. - PubMed
    1. Angelopoulos K., Economides G., Philippopoulos A. First-and second-best allocations under economic and environmental uncertainty. Int. Tax Public Finance. 2013;20(3):360–380.
    1. Annicchiarico B., Di Dio F. Environmental policy and macroeconomic dynamics in a new Keynesian model. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2015;69:1–21.
    1. Argentiero A., Atalla T., Bigerna S., Micheli S., Polinori P. Comparing Renewable Energy Policies in EU-15, US and China. A Bayesian DSGE Model. The Energy Journal. 2017;38(KAPSARC Special Issue)