Bacterial colonization at caesarean section defects in women of secondary infertility: an observational study
- PMID: 35180844
- PMCID: PMC8857828
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04471-y
Bacterial colonization at caesarean section defects in women of secondary infertility: an observational study
Abstract
Background: Delayed childbearing has been noted in a high percentage of women with a previous Caesarean section (CS). Many women with CS scar defects (CSDs) present with clinical symptoms of irregular vaginal bleeding. The present study aimed to investigate bacterial colonies at CSDs in women suffering from secondary infertility.
Methods: This observational study included 363 women with secondary infertility who visited the Assisted Reproduction Unit between 2008 and 2013. Among them, 172 women with a previous CS and 191 women with no previous CS were approached. The women with a previous CS had their CS operations in the past 1 to 14 years, with a mean of 3.5 years. The presence of CSDs was detected by vaginal ultrasonography. Bacteriology cultures of specimens taken from the uterine niches in those with CSDs were collected during Day 7 to Day 10 of the follicular phase. Specimens were obtained from the endocervical canal for bacterial culture in those without CSDs. The main outcome measure was the detection of the growth of bacterial colonies.
Results: CSDs were found in 60.4% (96 of 159) of women with a previous CS. In women with a previous CS, bacterial colonies were identified in 89.6% (86 of 96) and 69.8% (44 of 63) of women with and without CSDs, respectively. In women with no previous CS, 49.7% (88 out of 177) of bacterial cultures of endocervical samples showed bacterial colony growth. Gram-positive cocci (P = 0.0017, odds ratio (OR) = 1.576, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -22.5 to - 5.4) and Gram-negative rods (P = 0.0016, OR = 1.74, CI - 20.8 to - 5.0) were the most commonly isolated bacteria and contributed to approximately 90% of all microorganisms found in those with a previous CS. In women with a previous CS, more Gram-negative rods were isolated (P = 0.01, OR = 1.765, CI - 27.2 to - 3.8), especially Pseudomonas species (P = 0.02, OR = 1.97, CI - 16.7 to - 1.0), in those with visible CSDs than in those without CSDs.
Conclusions: Bacterial colonization at CSDs was found in a high percentage of women with secondary infertility.
Keywords: Bacterial colonization; Caesarean section scar defect (CSD); Secondary infertility; Uterine niche.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest need to be mentioned in this study.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.BMC Womens Health. 2021 May 13;21(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01337-x. BMC Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 33985487 Free PMC article.
-
Does the presence of a Caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit?Hum Reprod. 2013 Jun;28(6):1489-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det110. Epub 2013 Apr 12. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23585560
-
Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Oct 12;57(10):1091. doi: 10.3390/medicina57101091. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 34684128 Free PMC article.
-
Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased.Fertil Steril. 2020 Apr;113(4):704-716. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.037. Fertil Steril. 2020. PMID: 32228874 Review.
-
Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):562-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 May 14. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23680518 Review.
Cited by
-
Exosomes derived from hUC-MSCs exhibit ameliorative efficacy upon previous cesarean scar defect via orchestrating β-TrCP/CHK1 axis.Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):489. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84689-2. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39747551 Free PMC article.
-
High Risk of Chronic Endometritis in Isthmocele-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2025 May 22;14(11):3628. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113628. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40507391 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence, definition, and etiology of cesarean scar defect and treatment of cesarean scar disorder: A narrative review.Reprod Med Biol. 2023 Aug 9;22(1):e12532. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12532. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2023. PMID: 37577060 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of caesarean scar defects on the success of assisted human reproduction: the NICHE-ART prospective French cohort study protocol.BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 7;14(12):e092011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092011. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39645254 Free PMC article.
-
Transvaginal uterine niche repair: surgical technique and outcome.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Sep;16(3):301-309. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.3.039. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024. PMID: 39357861 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hemminki E, Graubard BI, Hoffman HJ, Mosher WD, Fetterly K. Cesarean section and subsequent fertility: results from the 1982 National Survey of family growth. Fertil Steril. 1985;43(4):520–528. - PubMed
-
- Hall M, Campbell D, Fraser C, Lemon J. Mode of delivery and future fertility. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(11):1297–1303. - PubMed
-
- Leitch C, Walker J. The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(6):621–626. - PubMed
-
- Jolly J, Walker J, Bhabra K. Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106(3):227–232. - PubMed
-
- Murphy D, Stirrat G, Heron J. The relationship between caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14 541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1914–1917. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous