Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):135.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04471-y.

Bacterial colonization at caesarean section defects in women of secondary infertility: an observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Bacterial colonization at caesarean section defects in women of secondary infertility: an observational study

Isabel Hsu et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Delayed childbearing has been noted in a high percentage of women with a previous Caesarean section (CS). Many women with CS scar defects (CSDs) present with clinical symptoms of irregular vaginal bleeding. The present study aimed to investigate bacterial colonies at CSDs in women suffering from secondary infertility.

Methods: This observational study included 363 women with secondary infertility who visited the Assisted Reproduction Unit between 2008 and 2013. Among them, 172 women with a previous CS and 191 women with no previous CS were approached. The women with a previous CS had their CS operations in the past 1 to 14 years, with a mean of 3.5 years. The presence of CSDs was detected by vaginal ultrasonography. Bacteriology cultures of specimens taken from the uterine niches in those with CSDs were collected during Day 7 to Day 10 of the follicular phase. Specimens were obtained from the endocervical canal for bacterial culture in those without CSDs. The main outcome measure was the detection of the growth of bacterial colonies.

Results: CSDs were found in 60.4% (96 of 159) of women with a previous CS. In women with a previous CS, bacterial colonies were identified in 89.6% (86 of 96) and 69.8% (44 of 63) of women with and without CSDs, respectively. In women with no previous CS, 49.7% (88 out of 177) of bacterial cultures of endocervical samples showed bacterial colony growth. Gram-positive cocci (P = 0.0017, odds ratio (OR) = 1.576, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -22.5 to - 5.4) and Gram-negative rods (P = 0.0016, OR = 1.74, CI - 20.8 to - 5.0) were the most commonly isolated bacteria and contributed to approximately 90% of all microorganisms found in those with a previous CS. In women with a previous CS, more Gram-negative rods were isolated (P = 0.01, OR = 1.765, CI - 27.2 to - 3.8), especially Pseudomonas species (P = 0.02, OR = 1.97, CI - 16.7 to - 1.0), in those with visible CSDs than in those without CSDs.

Conclusions: Bacterial colonization at CSDs was found in a high percentage of women with secondary infertility.

Keywords: Bacterial colonization; Caesarean section scar defect (CSD); Secondary infertility; Uterine niche.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest need to be mentioned in this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An ultrasonographic picture showing a sagittal view of the uterus and cervix. The left arrow indicates fluid accumulation in the uterine cavity, and the right arrow indicates a lesion measuring 9.8 × 7.0 mm at the lower uterine segment - a Caesarean section scar defect. A remaining myometrium thickness of 5 mm was measured
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart identification of participants in this study. CSD: Caesarean section defect

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hemminki E, Graubard BI, Hoffman HJ, Mosher WD, Fetterly K. Cesarean section and subsequent fertility: results from the 1982 National Survey of family growth. Fertil Steril. 1985;43(4):520–528. - PubMed
    1. Hall M, Campbell D, Fraser C, Lemon J. Mode of delivery and future fertility. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(11):1297–1303. - PubMed
    1. Leitch C, Walker J. The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(6):621–626. - PubMed
    1. Jolly J, Walker J, Bhabra K. Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106(3):227–232. - PubMed
    1. Murphy D, Stirrat G, Heron J. The relationship between caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14 541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1914–1917. - PubMed

Publication types