Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2022 Feb 18;12(1):2843.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04826-7.

Performances of rapid and connected salivary RT-LAMP diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 infection in ambulatory screening

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Performances of rapid and connected salivary RT-LAMP diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 infection in ambulatory screening

Francisco Santos Schneider et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In the context of social events reopening and economic relaunch, sanitary surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 infection is still required. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic performances of a rapid, extraction-free and connected reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay on saliva. Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and saliva from 443 outpatients were collected simultaneously and tested by reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) as reference standard test. Seventy-one individuals (16.0%) were positive by NP and/or salivary RT-qPCR. Sensitivity and specificity of salivary RT-LAMP were 85.9% (95%CI 77.8-94.0%) and 99.5% (98.7-100%), respectively. Performances were similar for symptomatic and asymptomatic participants. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 genetic variants were analyzed and no dominant mutation in RT-LAMP primer region was observed during the period of the study. We demonstrated that this RT-LAMP test on self-collected saliva is reliable for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This simple connected test with optional automatic results transfer to health authorities is unique and opens the way to secure professional and social events in actual context of economics restart.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

F.S.S, J.E., J.B. and M.D. are employees of SkillCell. C.C., D.D. and P.K. are listed as inventors on a pending patent application on EasyCOV® Reader and hold shares of Vogo. A.P.L. is the CEO of SkillCell and holds shares of Alcen, mother company of SkillCell. F.M. is listed as inventor on a pending patent application on the diagnostic use of EasyCOV® and holds shares in SkillCell. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram. RT-LAMP, reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification; COVID, Coronavirus disease; TN, true negative; FN, false negative; TP, true positive; FP, false positive for salivary RT-LAMP.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Sensitivity of salivary RT-LAMP evaluated against NP and salivary RT-qPCR Ct values. Ct value cutoffs indicate the infectious status of individuals considered as positive/negative. Dots formula image show sensitivity (%) of RT-LAMP against salivary RT-qPCR (R2 = 0.92). Triangles formula image show sensitivity (%) of salivary RT-LAMP compared to NP RT-qPCR (R2 = 0.61). RT-qPCR, reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction; RT-LAMP, reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification; NP, nasopharyngeal; Sal, salivary; Ct, cycle threshold. (B) Comparison of Ct Value between NP and salivary RT-qPCR. Dots represent experimentally measured Ct values of nasopharyngeal (X) and salivary (Y) RT-qPCR. Positive concordant individuals (positive for both NP and salivary RT-qPCR) are in down left white corner formula image. Negative concordant individuals (Ct value ≥ 35 for both NP and salivary RT-qPCR) are in upper right white corner formula image. Discordant results (negative for one specimen and positive for the other in RT-qPCR) are on the grey zones of the graphic (NP+/Sal- formula image; NP-/Sal+formula image).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guo WL, Jiang Q, Ye F, et al. Effect of throat washings on detection of 2019 novel coronavirus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71(8):1980–1981. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa416. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall EW, Luisi N, Zlotorzynska M, et al. Willingness to use home collection methods to provide specimens for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 research: survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e19471. doi: 10.2196/19471. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegler AJ, Hall E, Luisi N, et al. Willingness to seek diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 with home, drive-through, and clinic-based specimen collection locations. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(7):ofaa269. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa269. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan JF, Zhang AJ, Yuan S, et al. Simulation of the clinical and pathological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a golden syrian hamster model: Implications for disease pathogenesis and transmissibility. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71(9):2428–2446. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa325. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azzi L, Carcano G, Gianfagna F, et al. Saliva is a reliable tool to detect SARS-CoV-2. J. Infect. 2020;81(1):e45–e50. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts