Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;67(3):1176-1183.
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14999. Epub 2022 Feb 18.

Recovery of DNA from SERATECⓇ immunochromatographic PSA and saliva test strips

Jillian Conte  1   2 , Ashley Ruddy  2   3 , Lindsey Domonoski  4   5 , Aubrey Shanahan  6 , Natalie Daley  1 , Colleen McDevitt  1 , Gabriela Roca  7
Affiliations

Recovery of DNA from SERATECⓇ immunochromatographic PSA and saliva test strips

Jillian Conte et al. J Forensic Sci. 2022 May.

Abstract

There is an increased use of immunochromatographic test strips to presumptively identify bodily fluids of forensic interest, such as blood, semen, and saliva. Commonly, forensic samples are of low quantities. In the practice of conserving limited samples, it would be ideal to be able to recover the genetic material deposited on these testing membranes. This research aimed to determine whether DNA could be extracted from semen and saliva test strips, which part of the test strip is best to use, and to assess the quality of the DNA recovered. Semen and saliva samples were deposited on SERATEC® PSA Semiquant and Amylase Tests and analyzed. The testing membrane was then removed from the cassette and DNA extraction methods (forensicGEM Universal, forensicGEM Sperm, QIAamp® DNA Mini kit, Monarch® Nucleic Acid Purification kit, and organic extraction) were performed. Quality was evaluated by qPCR and STR analysis. DNA from semen was best extracted using the Monarch® Nucleic Acid Purification kit, while saliva was best extracted using the forensicGEM or QIAamp kits. No significant differences were observed between collection of the sample well pad and testing strip, thus use of the entire strip is encouraged. DNA from semen and saliva was quantifiable with a 1:1000 dilution. DNA quality analysis by qPCR showed that there is no difference in the DNA quality following elution from the test strip. However, degradation was noted in saliva samples and some semen samples by STR analysis. Scientists are encouraged to consider processed test strips for DNA profiling to preserve evidence.

Keywords: DNA extraction; immunochromatographic test; lateral flow test strip; presumptive; saliva; semen.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ng HH, Lim M-L, Hoe SY, Yong ZD, Ping YS, Ang HC, et al. Modified differential DNA extraction to reduce processing time of sexual assault exhibits. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2017;6:e252-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.094
    1. Rodriguez JJRB, Calacal GC, Laude RP, De Ungria MCA. Integrating presumptive and confirmatory semen tests into DNA profiling of sexual assault evidence: a Philippine example. Egyptian J Forensic Sci. 2019;9(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-019-0149-z
    1. Barbaro A, Cormaci P, Votano S, La Marca A. Evaluation study about the SERATEC ® rapid tests. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2015;5:e63-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.025
    1. Old JB, Schweers BA, Boonlayangoor PW, Reich KA. Developmental validation of RSID™ -saliva: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of saliva. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(4):866-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01055.x
    1. Old J, Schweers BA, Boonlayangoor PW, Fischer B, Miller KWP, Reich K. Developmental validation of RSID™ -semen: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of human semen. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57(2):489-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01968.x