Candida periprosthetic infection of the knee: a systematic review of surgical treatments and clinical outcomes
- PMID: 35182240
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03224-z
Candida periprosthetic infection of the knee: a systematic review of surgical treatments and clinical outcomes
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Candida periprosthetic infection of the knee: a systematic review of surgical treatments and clinical outcomes.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):909. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03239-6. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. PMID: 35275245 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Candida periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a rare cause of prosthesis revision with severe consequences and challenging treatment. This study aims to produce a systematic analysis of types of treatment and outcome of knee Candida PJIs and their correlation with specific pathogen species.
Methods: During April 2021, a literature search was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Reviewers used the Oxford Level of Evidence (LoE) and Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) score. Modal value of surgical, pharmacological treatment and outcome along with the correlation between types of treatment and outcome was calculated through Chi-square or Fisher exact test.
Results: In total, 115 cases were collected through 51 articles, identifying 116 pathogens. Candida albicans was the most frequent pathogen. Analysis of LoE reveals 40 LoE 5 and 11 LoE 4. Thirteen patients underwent one-stage revision, 46 patients two-stage revision, 6 patients resection arthroplasty and arthrodesis, 4 patients long-term antifungal therapy, and 3 patients debridement with prosthesis retention. Global rate of success was 85.14%. Modal distribution revealed a preference for two-stage revision and Fluconazole in medical therapy. No difference in terms of fungal eradication was found among Candida species (p = 0.503) and for treatments except for two-stage revision and resection arthroplasty (p = 0.0125) or debridement with implant retention (p = 0.0498), and the rest of procedures and resection arthroplasty (0.0192). MINORS score was poor.
Conclusions: Analysis of the literature did not highlight any difference between types of surgical treatment and pathogens in terms of relapse or infection eradication. However, two-stage replacement may be preferred, allowing healing of infection in most cases.
Keywords: Candida species; Debridement; One-stage revision; Resection arthroplasty, arthrodesis; Two-stage revision.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A et al (2008) Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1710–1715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0209-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Del Pozo JL, Patel R (2009) Infection associated with prosthetic joints. N Engl J Med 361:787–794. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp0905029 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cobo F, Rodríguez-Granger J, Sampedro A et al (2017) Candida prosthetic joint infection. A review of treatment methods. J Bone Jt Infect 2:114–121. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.17699 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Geng L, Xu M, Yu L et al (2016) Risk factors and the clinical and surgical features of fungal prosthetic joint infections: a retrospective analysis of eight cases. Exp Ther Med 12:991–999. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3353 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR et al (2013) Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56:e1–e25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis803 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
