Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses
- PMID: 35183735
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106264
Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) has emerged as an alternative for kidney transplant recipients with the potential benefits of minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the clinical outcomes of RAKT with open kidney transplantation (OKT).
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were collected, as well as long-term renal function and data on graft and patient survival.
Results: Eleven studies were included, which compared 482 RAKT procedures with 1316 OKT procedures. RAKT was associated with lower a risk of surgical site infection (Risk ratio (RR) = 0.15, p < 0.001), symptomatic lymphocele (RR = 0.20, p = 0.03), less postoperative pain (Mean difference (MD) = -1.38 points, p < 0.001), smaller incision length (MD = -8.51 cm, p < 0.001), and shorter length of hospital stay (MD = -1.69 days, p = 0.03) compared with OKT. No difference was found in renal function, graft, and patient survival.
Conclusions: RAKT is a safe and feasible alternative to OKT with less surgical complications without compromising renal function, graft and patient survival.
Keywords: Graft survival; Kidney transplantation; Postoperative complications; Robotic surgical procedures; Surgical wound infection; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
A commentary on "Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses" [Int. J. Surg. 99 (2022) 106264].Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106756. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106756. Epub 2022 Jul 11. Int J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35835347 No abstract available.
-
A commentary on "Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses" [Int. J. Surg. 99 (2022) 106264].Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106755. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106755. Epub 2022 Jul 14. Int J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35843592 No abstract available.
References
-
- Merrill JP, Murray JE, Harrison JH, Guild WR. Successful homotransplantation of the human kidney between identical twins. J. Am. Med. Assoc . 1956;160(4):277-282.
-
- Nanni G, Tondolo V, Citterio F, Romagnoli J, Borgetti M, Boldrini G, et al. Comparison of oblique versus hockey-stick surgical incision for kidney transplantation. Transplant. Proc . 2005;37(6):2479-2481.
-
- Harris AD, Fleming B, Bromberg JS, Rock P, Nkonge G, Emerick M, et al. Surgical site infection after renal transplantation. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol . 2015;36(4):417-423.
-
- Lynch RJ, Ranney DN, Shijie C, Lee DS, Samala N, Englesbe MJ. Obesity, surgical site infection, and outcome following renal transplantation. Ann. Surg . 2009;250(6):1014-1020.
-
- Humar A, Ramcharan T, Denny R, Gillingham KJ, Payne WD, Matas AJ. Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression? Transplantation . 2001;72(12):1920-1923.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical

