Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses
- PMID: 35183735
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106264
Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) has emerged as an alternative for kidney transplant recipients with the potential benefits of minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the clinical outcomes of RAKT with open kidney transplantation (OKT).
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were collected, as well as long-term renal function and data on graft and patient survival.
Results: Eleven studies were included, which compared 482 RAKT procedures with 1316 OKT procedures. RAKT was associated with lower a risk of surgical site infection (Risk ratio (RR) = 0.15, p < 0.001), symptomatic lymphocele (RR = 0.20, p = 0.03), less postoperative pain (Mean difference (MD) = -1.38 points, p < 0.001), smaller incision length (MD = -8.51 cm, p < 0.001), and shorter length of hospital stay (MD = -1.69 days, p = 0.03) compared with OKT. No difference was found in renal function, graft, and patient survival.
Conclusions: RAKT is a safe and feasible alternative to OKT with less surgical complications without compromising renal function, graft and patient survival.
Keywords: Graft survival; Kidney transplantation; Postoperative complications; Robotic surgical procedures; Surgical wound infection; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
A commentary on "Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses" [Int. J. Surg. 99 (2022) 106264].Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106756. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106756. Epub 2022 Jul 11. Int J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35835347 No abstract available.
-
A commentary on "Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses" [Int. J. Surg. 99 (2022) 106264].Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106755. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106755. Epub 2022 Jul 14. Int J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35843592 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Living donor robotic-assisted kidney transplant compared to traditional living donor open kidney transplant. Where do we stand now? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2023 Dec;37(4):100789. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2023.100789. Epub 2023 Aug 11. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2023. PMID: 37604048
-
Open versus robotic-assisted kidney transplantation: A systematic review by the European Association of Urology (EAU) - Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Kidney Transplant Working Group.Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Oct;47(8):474-487. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 24. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023. PMID: 36965855 English, Spanish.
-
Robot-assisted vs open kidney transplantation from deceased donors.BJU Int. 2025 Sep;136(3):484-492. doi: 10.1111/bju.16799. Epub 2025 May 26. BJU Int. 2025. PMID: 40415630 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally Invasive, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-assisted Techniques Versus Open Techniques for Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):205-217. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Mar 3. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 28262412
-
Robot-assisted kidney transplantation: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis of early experience.Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7121-7133. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002019. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 39470289 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The allium stent for the complex ureteral stricture-deeper experience of a series case review.BJUI Compass. 2025 Jul 1;6(7):e70042. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70042. eCollection 2025 Jul. BJUI Compass. 2025. PMID: 40599592 Free PMC article.
-
Visualized knowledge map of robot application in surgical field: a bibliometric analysis.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 4;19(1):350. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02474-3. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40615684
-
The Impact of Cold Ischaemia Time on Outcomes of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 15;11(6):1620. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061620. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35329945 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnosis and treatment of Whipple disease after kidney transplantation: A case report.World J Clin Cases. 2023 Sep 6;11(25):6019-6024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.6019. World J Clin Cases. 2023. PMID: 37727483 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of outcomes after open versus robotic kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian J Urol. 2023 Jul-Sep;39(3):186-194. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_390_22. Epub 2023 Jun 30. Indian J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37575161 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Merrill JP, Murray JE, Harrison JH, Guild WR. Successful homotransplantation of the human kidney between identical twins. J. Am. Med. Assoc . 1956;160(4):277-282.
-
- Nanni G, Tondolo V, Citterio F, Romagnoli J, Borgetti M, Boldrini G, et al. Comparison of oblique versus hockey-stick surgical incision for kidney transplantation. Transplant. Proc . 2005;37(6):2479-2481.
-
- Harris AD, Fleming B, Bromberg JS, Rock P, Nkonge G, Emerick M, et al. Surgical site infection after renal transplantation. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol . 2015;36(4):417-423.
-
- Lynch RJ, Ranney DN, Shijie C, Lee DS, Samala N, Englesbe MJ. Obesity, surgical site infection, and outcome following renal transplantation. Ann. Surg . 2009;250(6):1014-1020.
-
- Humar A, Ramcharan T, Denny R, Gillingham KJ, Payne WD, Matas AJ. Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression? Transplantation . 2001;72(12):1920-1923.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical