Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Nov 1;68(11):1372-1378.
doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001668. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

In Vivo Suction Pressures of Venous Cannulas During Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Affiliations
Observational Study

In Vivo Suction Pressures of Venous Cannulas During Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Oliver Robak et al. ASAIO J. .

Abstract

Extracorporeal lung support includes the risk of hemolysis due to suction pressures. Manufacturers measure the negative suction pressure across drainage cannulas for their products in vitro using water. Clinical experience suggests that hemolysis occurs in vivo already at much lower flow rates. The aim of this study was to analyze the in vivo suction pressure for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) cannulas. Prospective, observational study at a tertiary-care intensive care unit: 15 patients on VV-ECMO for severe ARDS were prospectively included. In vitro , the 25 Fr drainage cannula pressure drops below a critical level of around -100 mm Hg at a flow rate of 7.9 L/min, the 23 Fr drainage cannula at 6.6 L/min. In the clinical setting, critical suction pressures were reached at much lower flow rates (5.5 and 4.7 L/min; p < 0.0001, nonlinear regression). The in vitro data largely overestimate the safely achievable flow rates in daily clinical practice by 2.4 L/min (or 44%, 25 Fr) and 1.9 L/min (or 41%, 23 Fr). In vivo measurement of suction pressure of venous drainage cannulas differed significantly from in vitro derived measurements as the latter largely underestimate the resulting suction pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

    1. Karagiannidis C, Bein T, Weber-Carstens S: [Indications and limitations of ECMO therapy: Considerations on evidence, treatment decisions and ethical challenges]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 114: 207–213, 2019.
    1. Shaheen A, Tanaka D, Cavarocchi NC, Hirose H: Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V V ECMO): Indications, preprocedural considerations, and technique. J Card Surg. 31: 248–252, 2016.
    1. Robak O, Schellongowski P, Bojic A, Laczika K, Locker GJ, Staudinger T: Short-term effects of combining upright and prone positions in patients with ARDS: A prospective randomized study. Crit Care. 15: R230, 2011.
    1. Hecker M, Bandorski D, Hecker A: Extrakorporale Lungenunterstützungsverfahren. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 107: 491501, 2012.
    1. Lehle K, Philipp A, Müller T, et al.: Flow dynamics of different adult ECMO systems: A clinical evaluation. Artif Organs. 38: 391–398, 2014.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources