Towards diagnostic criteria for malignant deep penetrating melanocytic tumors using single nucleotide polymorphism array and next-generation sequencing
- PMID: 35184152
- DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01026-6
Towards diagnostic criteria for malignant deep penetrating melanocytic tumors using single nucleotide polymorphism array and next-generation sequencing
Abstract
Cutaneous deep penetrating melanocytic neoplasms frequently simulate melanoma and might occasionally progress to metastatic melanoma. Distinguishing deep penetrating nevi (DPN) and deep penetrating melanocytomas (DPM) from malignant deep penetrating tumors (MDPT) is difficult based on histopathology alone, and diagnostic criteria for MDPT are currently lacking. Using a molecular workup, we aimed to provide readily available diagnostic tools for classification of deep penetrating tumors. We used clinical follow-up and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) array for tumor classification of 20 deep penetrating neoplasms to identify associations with histopathological, immunohistochemistry, and NGS findings. Ten neoplasms were classified as MDPT, four as DPM, and six as DPN. Two MDPT showed metastases. The following parameters were statistically significantly associated with MDPT: severe nuclear atypia (risk ratio [RR] 2.9, p < 0.05), absence of a nevus component (RR 10.0, p = 0.04), positive PRAME expression (RR 9.0, p = 0.02), complete loss of p16 expression (RR 3.5, p = 0.003), TERT-p and APC mutations (RR 11.0, p = 0.01 and RR 2.7, p = 0.002, respectively), and ≥1 additional pathogenic mutation (RR 9.0, p = 0.02). Ki-67 expression ≥ 5% was not significantly associated with MDPTs, although it was <5% in all DPNs. Three MDPT did not show nuclear β-catenin expression despite having a CTNNB1 (n = 2) or an APC mutation (n = 1). Our findings suggest that complete loss of p16 and positive PRAME expression, a driver mutation in APC, ≥ 1 additional pathogenic mutation, especially in TERT-p, support an MDPT diagnosis in deep penetrating neoplasms. Besides severe nuclear atypia and possibly severe inflammation, we did not identify specific histopathological criteria for malignancy. Non-aberrant nuclear β-catenin expression might not exclude a deep penetrating signature in MDPT.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology.
References
-
- Cosgarea, I., Griewank, K. G., Ungureanu, L., Tamayo, A. & Siepmann, T. Deep penetrating nevus and borderline-deep penetrating nevus: a literature review. Front. Oncol. 10, 837 (2020). - DOI
-
- Robson, A., Morley-Quante, M., Hempel, H., McKee, P. H. & Calonje, E. Deep penetrating naevus: clinicopathological study of 31 cases with further delineation of histological features allowing distinction from other pigmented benign melanocytic lesions and melanoma. Histopathology 43, 529–537 (2003). - DOI
-
- Cerroni, L. et al. Melanocytic tumors of uncertain malignant potential: results of a tutorial held at the XXIX symposium of the international society of dermatopathology in Graz, October 2008. Am. J. Surg. 34, 314–326 (2010).
-
- Magro, C. M. et al. Deep penetrating nevus-like borderline tumors: a unique subset of ambiguous melanocytic tumors with malignant potential and normal cytogenetics. Eur. J. Dermatol. 24, 594–602 (2014). - DOI
-
- Abraham, R. M., Ming, M. E., Elder, D. E. & Xu, X. An atypical melanocytic lesion without genomic abnormalities shows locoregional metastasis. J. Cutan. Pathol. 39, 21–24 (2012). - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous