Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 7:485:36-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.02.040. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

Multi-modal trained artificial intelligence solution to triage chest X-ray for COVID-19 using pristine ground-truth, versus radiologists

Affiliations

Multi-modal trained artificial intelligence solution to triage chest X-ray for COVID-19 using pristine ground-truth, versus radiologists

Tao Tan et al. Neurocomputing (Amst). .

Abstract

The front-line imaging modalities computed tomography (CT) and X-ray play important roles for triaging COVID patients. Thoracic CT has been accepted to have higher sensitivity than a chest X-ray for COVID diagnosis. Considering the limited access to resources (both hardware and trained personnel) and issues related to decontamination, CT may not be ideal for triaging suspected subjects. Artificial intelligence (AI) assisted X-ray based application for triaging and monitoring require experienced radiologists to identify COVID patients in a timely manner with the additional ability to delineate and quantify the disease region is seen as a promising solution for widespread clinical use. Our proposed solution differs from existing solutions presented by industry and academic communities. We demonstrate a functional AI model to triage by classifying and segmenting a single chest X-ray image, while the AI model is trained using both X-ray and CT data. We report on how such a multi-modal training process improves the solution compared to single modality (X-ray only) training. The multi-modal solution increases the AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) from 0.89 to 0.93 for a binary classification between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases. It also positively impacts the Dice coefficient (0.59 to 0.62) for localizing the COVID-19 pathology. To compare the performance of experienced readers to the AI model, a reader study is also conducted. The AI model showed good consistency with respect to radiologists. The DICE score between two radiologists on the COVID group was 0.53 while the AI had a DICE value of 0.52 and 0.55 when compared to the segmentation done by the two radiologists separately. From a classification perspective, the AUCs of two readers was 0.87 and 0.81 while the AUC of the AI is 0.93 based on the reader study dataset. We also conducted a generalization study by comparing our method to the-state-art methods on independent datasets. The results show better performance from the proposed method. Leveraging multi-modal information for the development benefits the single-modal inferencing.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; COVID-19; Multi-modal; Reader study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The training scheme and inferencing design.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The illustration of synthetic X-ray and its mask generation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A synthetic X-ray with its corresponding projected disease mask as an overlay.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
An example of transferring synthetic X-ray mask to X-ray mask. Top: a representative synthetic X-ray generated from CT, the corresponding lung image and disease mask; Middle: paired X-ray, the corresponding lung image and direct disease annotation from X-ray; bottom: X-ray with transferred annotations from CT shown as red contour; registered lung image from synthetic X-ray and transferred disease annotations from synthetic X-ray.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The schematic overview of our proposed classification and segmentation deep-learning model.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Examples with large annotation inconsistencies where TMA as red contour, XMA as blue regions and PMA as green regions.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Segmentation examples where images on the left are original X-ray images, in the middle are PMA and on the right are AI segmentations.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
ROC curves of radiologists and the AI system in the use case of COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 classification.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Awadhi Abdullah M., Al-Saifi Khaled, Al-Awadhi Ahmad, Alhamadi Salah. Death and contagious infectious diseases: Impact of the covid-19 virus on stock market returns. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marcus S Shaker, John Oppenheimer, Mitchell Grayson, David Stukus, Nicholas Hartog, Elena WY Hsieh, Nicholas Rider, Cullen M Dutmer, Timothy K Vander Leek, Harold Kim, et al., Covid-19: pandemic contingency planning for the allergy and immunology clinic, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. In Practice, 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leung Kathy, Wu Joseph T., Liu Di, Leung Gabriel M. First-wave covid-19 transmissibility and severity in china outside hubei after control measures, and second-wave scenario planning: a modelling impact assessment. The Lancet. 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali Inayat. Covid-19: Are we ready for the second wave? Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2020:1–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alberto Aleta, David Martin-Corral, Ana Pastore y Piontti, Marco Ajelli, Maria Litvinova, Matteo Chinazzi, Natalie E Dean, M Elizabeth Halloran, Ira M Longini Jr, Stefano Merler, et al., Modeling the impact of social distancing, testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second-wave scenarios of the covid-19 epidemic, medRxiv, 2020. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources