Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 3:13:817905.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.817905. eCollection 2022.

Robust and Functional Immune Memory Up to 9 Months After SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Southeast Asian Longitudinal Cohort

Affiliations

Robust and Functional Immune Memory Up to 9 Months After SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Southeast Asian Longitudinal Cohort

Hoa Thi My Vo et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

The duration of humoral and cellular immune memory following SARS-CoV-2 infection in populations in least developed countries remains understudied but is key to overcome the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Sixty-four Cambodian individuals with laboratory-confirmed infection with asymptomatic or mild/moderate clinical presentation were evaluated for Spike (S)-binding and neutralizing antibodies and antibody effector functions during acute phase of infection and at 6-9 months follow-up. Antigen-specific B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were characterized, and T cells were interrogated for functionality at late convalescence. Anti-S antibody titers decreased over time, but effector functions mediated by S-specific antibodies remained stable. S- and nucleocapsid (N)-specific B cells could be detected in late convalescence in the activated memory B cell compartment and are mostly IgG+. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell immune memory was maintained to S and membrane (M) protein. Asymptomatic infection resulted in decreased antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and frequency of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells at late convalescence. Whereas anti-S antibodies correlated with S-specific B cells, there was no correlation between T cell response and humoral immune memory. Hence, all aspects of a protective immune response are maintained up to nine months after SARS-CoV-2 infection and in the absence of re-infection.

Keywords: B cell immunity; SARS-CoV-2; T cell immunity; antibody effector function; long term immune response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of antibody response in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals during the acute phase and 6-9 months post infection. Non-infected samples obtained before the pandemic (pre), and SARS-Cov-2 infected individuals were sampled 2-9 days post laboratory confirmation and 6-9 months later. (A) Schematic model of the S-Flow assay. (B) Amount of antibodies against spike protein were reported as percentage of spike-expressing 293T cells bound by IgM, IgG, IgA in the S-Flow assay. (C) Pie charts show the proportion of anti-S IgM, IgG and IgA antibodies. (D) SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity was calculated as FRNT50 titer in foci reduction neutralization test (FRNT). (E) Comparison of the percentage of individuals positive for anti-S IgM, IgG, IgA and FRNT50. Statistical comparisons were performed by Mann Whitney test (B, D) and Chi-square test (C, E). The dashed line indicates the cutoff for positivity based on values calculated following formula: cut-off = % mean positive cells from 19 pre-pandemic samples + 3x standard deviation. Each dot represents the result from a single individual. Lines represent median and IQR. *p < 0.05 and ****p < 0.0001. Pre-pandemic n=19, acute n=33, 6-9 months n=64.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of effector function profiles of plasma from SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals during the acute phase and 6-9 months post infection. Non-infected samples obtained before the pandemic (pre), and SARS-Cov-2 infected individuals were sampled 2-9 days post laboratory confirmation and 6-9 months later. (A) Schematic representation of the antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) assay. (B) Comparison of ADCP activity in pre-pandemic samples, SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals in the acute phase of infection and 6-9 months later. (C) Percentage of individuals with ADCP above the cutoff for positivity. (D) Ratio of ADCP to anti-spike IgG measured by S-Flow. (E) Schematic representation of complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay. (F) Comparison of CDC activity in pre-pandemic samples, SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals in the acute phase of infection and 6-9 months later. (G) Percentage of individuals with CDC above the cutoff for positivity. (H) Ratio of CDC to anti-spike IgG as measured by S-Flow. (I) Schematic representation of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). SARS-CoV-2 plasma induced NK degranulation as measured by CD107a staining using spike-expressing 293T cells as target cells. NK cells were isolated from healthy donors. (J) Comparison of ADCC activity in pre-pandemic samples, SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals in the acute phase of infection and 6-9 months later. (K) Percentage of individuals with ADCC above the cutoff for positivity. (L) Ratio of ADCC to anti-spike IgG as measured by S-Flow. Statistical comparisons were performed by Mann Whitney test. The dashed line indicates the cutoff for positivity set based on values calculated following formula: cut-off = % mean positive cells from 19 pre-pandemic samples + 3x standard deviation. Each dot represents result from a single individual. Lines represent median and IQR. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Pre-pandemic: n=19, acute ADCP and CDC: n=30, acute ADCC: n=32, 6-9 months ADCP, CDC and ADCC: n=64.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Characterization of antigen-specific memory B cells in the peripheral blood of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 6-9 months after infection. (A) Schematic representation of the memory B cell assay. (B) Comparison of percentages of S1-specific or N-specific memory B cells (CD19+CD27+). (C, D) Percentages of S1- and N-specific B cells among resting memory B cells (CD38-), activated memory B cells (CD38+) or plasmablasts within the CD27+ memory B cell population. (E, F) Proportion of S1-specific and N-specific CD27+CD19+ B cell subsets for each individual and the whole cohort (G, H) Percentages of S1- and N-specific cells in non-class-switched B cells (IgD-IgM+) or class-switched B cells (IgD-IgA+ or IgD-IgG+). (I, J) Proportion of S1-specific and N-specific switched and unswitched CD19+ B cells for each individual and for the whole cohort. Statistical comparisons were performed by Mann-Whitney test (B), Wilcoxon Rank Sum test (C, D, G, H) or Chi-square test (F, J). Each dot represents result from a single individual. Lines represent median and IQR (n=40). *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. n = 40. S1, subunit 1 of spike protein; N, Nucleocapsid protein.
Figure 4
Figure 4
SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells 6-9 months post-infection. (A) Schematic representation of the CD4+ T cell assay (B) Frequency (percentage of CD4+ T cells) of total SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 + T cells after overnight stimulation with S, M and N peptide pools as assessed by induced expression of OX40 and CD137. Each dot represents result from a single individual (n=33). Lines represent median and IQR. (B) Distribution of SARS-CoV-2–specific CD4 + T cells among central memory, effector memory, and terminally differentiated effector memory cells (TEMRA). (C) Frequencies of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T helper (Th) subset. (D) Cytokine production and (E) pie chart representing the multifunctional SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cell response assessed by intracellular cytokine staining after incubation with SARS-CoV-2 peptides compared to unstimulated control, n=8. SARS-CoV-2 specific activation and cytokine production were calculated by subtracted the unstimulated control from the SARS-CoV-2 peptide stimulated condition. Statistical comparisons were performed by Kruskal-Wallis test (B) and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test (F). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. S1, subunit 1 of spike protein; M, membrane protein; N, nucleocapsid protein.
Figure 5
Figure 5
SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells 6-9 months post-infection. (A) Frequency (percentage of CD8+ T cells) of total SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 + T cells after overnight stimulation with S, M and N peptide pools as assessed by induced expression of CD69 and CD137. Each dot represents result of a single individual (n=33). Lines represent median and IQR. (B) Distribution of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 + T cells among central memory, effector memory, and terminally differentiated effector memory cells (TEMRA). (C) Cytokine production and (D) pie chart representing the multifunctional CD8 + T of SARS-Cov-2-specific T cells assessed by intracellular cytokine staining after incubation with SARS-CoV-2 peptides compared to unstimulated control, n=8. SARS-CoV-2 specific activation and cytokine production were calculated by subtracted the unstimulated control from the SARS-CoV-2 peptide stimulated condition. (A) Kruskal-Wallis test and (D) Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. *p < 0.05. S1, subunit 1 of spike protein; M, membrane protein; N, nucleocapsid protein.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of adaptive immune memory in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. (A). Comparisons of ADCC activity in asymptomatic (asymp; n=12) versus symptomatic (symp; n=20) individuals in the acute phase and 6-9 months after confirmed infection using 293T-spike cells as target cell. Percentage of CD107a positive cells is measured as readout for ADCC. (B) Comparison of percentages of S1-specific or N-specific memory B cells (CD19+CD27+) between 11 asymptomatic individuals and 29 symptomatic individuals. (C) Frequency (percentage of CD4+ T cells) of total SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells after overnight stimulation with peptide pools comparing asymptomatic individuals (asymp; n=11) with symptomatic patients (symp; n=22). (D) Comparison of CD4+ T cell memory phenotype between asymptomatic individuals (asymp; n=11) and symptomatic patients (symp; n=22). Statistical comparisons were performed by (A–C) Mann Whitney tests and (D) Chi-square test for trend *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Correlation of the functional anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses. (A) Spearman correlation matrix showing humoral immune memory and effector functions measured in the acute phase and 6-9 months post infection were correlated to each other and to frequencies of antigen-specific B and T cells measured 6-9 months after infection. Red represents a negative correlation between two variables and blue indicates a positive correlation. The size of the dot represents the magnitude of the correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis was performed with spearman correlation test. *p <0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.001. IgM: anti-S IgM titers, IgG: anti-S IgG titers, IgA: anti-S IgA titers, Neut: FRNT50 titers, CD4: total SARS-CoV-2 specific CD4+ T cells, S1.CD4: S-specific CD4+ T cells, N.CD4: N-specific CD4+ T cells, CD8: total SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8+ T cells, S1.CD8: S-specific CD8+ T cells, N.CD8: N-specific CD8+ T cells, S1.IgA: S1-specific IgD-IgA+ B cells, N.IgA: N-specific IgD-IgA+ B cells, S1. IgG: S1-specific IgD-IgG+ B cells, N.IgG: N-specific IgD-IgG+ B cells, S1.CD27: S1-specific CD27+ B cells, N.CD27: N-specific CD27+ B cells. (B) Venn diagram showing the relation of anti-S humoral immune responses at late convalescence. All individuals with detectable anti-S IgG titers are included (n=56). (C) Venn diagram showing the relation of anti-S IgG, S1-specific CD27+ B cells and S1-specific T cells at late convalescence. The cutoffs for S1-specific CD27+ B cell response and S-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were arbitrarily set above 0.1% (n =20).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. . Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of 99 Cases of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A Descriptive Study. Lancet (2020) 395:507–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. . Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med (2020) 382:1708–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. . A Novel Coronavirus From Patients With Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med (2020) 382:727–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dan JM, Mateus J, Kato Y, Hastie KM, Yu ED, Faliti CE, et al. . Immunological Memory to SARS-CoV-2 Assessed for Up to 8 Months After Infection. Science (2021) 371:eabf4063. doi: 10.1126/science.abf4063 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartley GE, Edwards ESJ, Aui PM, Varese N, Stojanovic S, McMahon J, et al. . Rapid Generation of Durable B Cell Memory to SARS-CoV-2 Spike and Nucleocapsid Proteins in COVID-19 and Convalescence. Sci Immunol (2020) 5:e01991-20. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abf8891 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances