Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;31(8):655-662.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.13498. Epub 2022 Mar 5.

Are Root-Supported Overdentures Still an Alternative to Implant-Supported Overdentures? A Scoping Review

Ronald L Ettinger  1 , Leonardo Marchini  2 , Christopher A Childs  3
Affiliations

Are Root-Supported Overdentures Still an Alternative to Implant-Supported Overdentures? A Scoping Review

Ronald L Ettinger et al. J Prosthodont. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of prosthodontic treatment for subjects wearing a complete maxillary denture opposing a root-supported mandibular overdenture (RSO) or an implant-supported mandibular overdenture (ISO).

Methods: A literature search was performed in seven electronic databases: MEDLINE via PubMed interface, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, and AgeLine. The search terms were developed by the primary investigators and the health sciences librarian, who then started with PubMed and adapted the original search strategy for the other databases. Included articles were those that compared the outcomes for mandibular RSOs and those with ISOs, for persons wearing a maxillary complete denture.

Results: Seven articles were included in the review. There were limitations in this review because of small sample sizes, short study durations, and different methodologies. Also, no comparative studies were identified for clinically important outcomes, such as survival rates of abutments, prosthodontics/maintenance problems, and longitudinal cost of care. For prosthodontic complications, patient satisfaction, and ability to clean, no differences were reported. For oral tactile sensibility, RSOs presented significantly improved sensibility, whereas ISOs had higher maximum bite force capability, but the difference was not statistically significant, except when subjects had a cross-bite or a lingualized occlusion.

Conclusions: The results of this scoping review were not conclusive, except for maximum bite force, where ISOs seem to perform better than RSOs by the measured criteria. ISOs had higher survival rates than RSOs, and required less maintenance, but were more expensive. It was disappointing to find so few studies comparing these clinical treatment modalities, which suggests that either treatment may be clinically acceptable and depends upon a shared decision between patients and their dentists.

Keywords: Overdentures; complete dentures; dental prosthesis; implant-supported; root-supported.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dye BA, Weatherspoon DJ, Lopez Mitnik G. Tooth loss among older adults according to poverty status in the United States from 1999 through 2004 and 2009 through 2014. J Am Dent Assoc 2019;150:9-23.e3
    1. Administration for Community Living 2019 Profile of Older Americans. 2020. p. 3. https://acl.gov/sites/default/files/Aging%20and%20Disability%20in%20Amer...
    1. Weintraub JA, Burt BA. Oral health status in the United States: tooth loss and edentulism. J Dent Educ 1985;49:368-378
    1. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? J Prosthet Dent 2002;870:5-8
    1. Turkyilmaz I, Company AM, McGlumphy EA. Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2010;27:3-10

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources