Neonatal anthropometry of malformed newborns: A large South American population-based study
- PMID: 35188679
- DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12843
Neonatal anthropometry of malformed newborns: A large South American population-based study
Abstract
Background: Population-based anthropometric evaluation of malformed newborns is scarce.
Objectives: To evaluate malformed newborns' foetal growth using the ICD 10 malformations' classification.
Methods: A study including 33,769 newborns (14,857 malformed and 18,912 nonmalformed), selected from 678,840 births from nine South American countries, period 2010-2018, was conducted. Prevalence of severe small and small for gestational age was calculated for malformed and nonmalformed newborns classified by preterm birth categories. Prevalence and relative risk (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The associations between anthropometric phenotypes and congenital malformations were evaluated with generalized linear models.
Results: Prevalence of preterm and term severe small and small for gestational age newborns was higher in malformed than that in nonmalformed neonates. For grouped ICD 10 malformations categories, the RR for severe small for gestational age was 2.88 (95% CI 2.51, 3.30) and 2.10 (95% CI 1.92, 2.30) for small for gestational age. For at-term and preterm malformed newborns, the RR for severe small for gestational age was 2.21 (95% CI 1.87, 2.61) and 3.21 (95% CI 2.52, 4.10), respectively; for small for gestational age, the RR was 2.31 (95% CI 2.11, 2.53) for at-term newborns and 2.58 (95% CI 2.16, 3.08) for preterm ones.
Conclusions: Prevalence and relative risk of severe small and small for gestational age vary according to the group of malformations and gestational age; they increase in congenital malformations of the nervous, respiratory and digestive systems, and in chromosomal abnormalities and are lower for malformations of eye, ear, face and neck and cleft lip and palate. Foetal growth considered together with malformed newborns' gestational age would allow for inferring different risks of morbidity and mortality.
Keywords: birth defects; birthweight; newborns; preterm; severe small and small for gestational age.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Christianson A, Howson CP, Modell B. Global report on birth defects. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. White Plains, New York. Available: https://www.marchofdimes.org/materials/global-report-on-birth-defects-th.... Last Accessed April 29, 2021.
-
- López-Camelo JS, Orioli IM. Heterogeneous rates for birth defects in Latin America: hints on causality. Genet Epidemiol. 1996;13:469-481.
-
- Gili JA, Poletta FA, Giménez LG, et al. Descriptive analysis of high birth prevalence rate geographical clusters of congenital anomalies in South America. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016;106(4):257-266.
-
- WHO. Birth defects report by the secretariat. Sixty-third world health assembly. 2010. https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/congenital-anomalies. Last accessed April 29, 2021.
-
- Villar J, de Onis M, Kestler E, Bolaños F, Cerezo R, Bernedes H. The differential neonatal morbidity of the intrauterine growth retardation syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(1 Pt 1):151-157.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
