Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 21;10(1):33.
doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00751-6.

No sound is more distracting than the one you're trying not to hear: delayed costs of mental control of task-irrelevant neutral and emotional sounds

Örn Kolbeinsson  1 , Erkin Asutay  2 , Manja Enström  2 , Jonas Sand  2 , Hugo Hesser  2   3
Affiliations

No sound is more distracting than the one you're trying not to hear: delayed costs of mental control of task-irrelevant neutral and emotional sounds

Örn Kolbeinsson et al. BMC Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Suppressing intrusive thoughts can result in a post-suppression rebound effect where the same thoughts become hyperaccessible. The current study aimed to investigate if similar so-called rebound effects could be observed when people attempted to mentally suppress awareness of nonsensical auditory stimuli. Based on previous research on thought suppression and mental control in other domains, we hypothesized that attempting to suppress awareness of a task-irrelevant sound while under cognitive load would impact evaluations of the sound on affective dimensions and loudness, and result in increased general vigilance, as evidenced by faster responding on subsequent tasks.

Methods: We performed two experiments where participants in a suppression condition were initially instructed to mentally suppress awareness of a sound while performing a mentally challenging task. Participants in a control condition performed the same task without receiving any instructions regarding the sound. In Experiment 1, the sound was affectively neutral, while in Experiment 2 participants were presented with an inherently aversive (tinnitus-like) sound. After this initial phase, participants performed tasks measuring vigilance and attention, and were also asked to give subjective ratings of the sounds on a number of affective dimensions and loudness.

Results: In Experiment 1, participants in the suppression condition showed faster response times on both a visual search task and an auditory spatial cueing task, as compared to participants in the control condition. Contrary to our predictions, participants in the suppression condition did not rate the distractor sound as louder than participants in the control condition, and there were no differences on affective dimensions. In Experiment 2, results revealed that participants in the suppression condition made more errors on a visual search task, specifically on trials where the previously suppressed sound was presented. In contrast to results from Experiment 1, participants in the suppression condition also rated the targeted sound as louder.

Conclusions: The findings provide preliminary support for a post-suppression rebound effect in the auditory domain and further suggest that this effect may be moderated by the emotional properties of the auditory stimulus.

Keywords: Emotion; Mental control; Sound; Suppression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean observed probability of making an error, across individuals and trials, on the visual search task in Experiment 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kattner F, Ellermeier W. Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018;44(8):1303–1312. - PubMed
    1. Röer JP, Körner U, Buchner A, Bell R. Attentional capture by taboo words: a functional view of auditory distraction. Emotion. 2017;17(4):740–750. - PubMed
    1. Max C, Widmann A, Kotz SA, Schröger E, Wetzel N. Distraction by emotional sounds: disentangling arousal benefits and orienting costs. Emotion. 2015;15(4):428–437. - PubMed
    1. Appel-Meulenbroek R, Steps S, Wenmaekers R, Arentze T. Coping strategies and perceived productivity in open-plan offices with noise problems. J Manag Psychol. 2020;36(4):400–414.
    1. Wegner DM. Ironic processes of mental control. Psychol Rev. 1994;101(1):34–52. - PubMed